How cited: Cluster 9002051 · Go Syfert

Cluster 9002051

green · 119 citation events across 33 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Cited · Fed. Cl. · signal: see
See Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight Sys., Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285-86 , 95 S.Ct. 438 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh’g denied, 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1340 (1975); Consolidated Eng’g Servs., Inc. v. United States, 64 Fed.Cl. 617, 623 (2005); Synetics, Inc. v. United States, 45 Fed.Cl. at 5; CRC Marine Servs., Inc. v. United States, 41 Fed.Cl. 66, 83 (1998); Analytical & Research Tech., Inc. v. United States, 39 Fed.Cl. at 42.
Cited · D. Ariz. · signal: see
See Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight Sys., Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 286 , 95 S.Ct. 438, 442 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh’g denied, 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1340 , 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975); Sears Sav.
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Bowman Transportation v. Arkansas Best-Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285 , 95 S.Ct. 438, 441 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh’g denied, 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1340 , 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975), aff'd 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1488 , 47 L.Ed.2d 750 (1976).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Bowman Transportation v. Arkansas Best-Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285 , 95 S.Ct. 438, 441 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh'g denied, 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1340 , 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975), aff'd 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1488 , 47 L.Ed.2d 750 (1976). 21 The labor parties insist that the department's change of policy is not only arbitrary and capricious, but that it flies in the face of the expressed will of Congress.
Cited · SCOTUS · signal: see
See 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1342 .
Cited (see also) · Fed. Cl. · signal: see also
Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983) (other citations omitted); see also Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285-86 (1974) (“The agency must articulate a ‘rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.’ While we may not supply a reasoned basis for the agency’s action that the agency itself has not given, we will uphold a decision of less than ideal clarity if the agency’s path may reasonably be discerned.”) (citations omitted), …
green Petri v. United States (2012)
Cited (see also) · Fed. Cl. · signal: see also
Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43-44 , 103 S.Ct. 2856 , 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983) (other citations omitted); see also Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285-86 , 95 S.Ct. 438 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974) (“The agency must articulate a ‘rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.’ While wmay not supply a reasoned basis for the agency’s action that the agency itself has not given, we will uphold a decision of less than ideal clarity if the…
Cited (see also) · Fed. Cl. · signal: see also
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971) (citations omitted); see also Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight Sys., Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285 , 95 S.Ct. 438 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh’g denied, 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1340 , 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975); In re Sang-Su Lee, 277 F.3d at 1342; Advanced Data Concepts, Inc. v. United States, 216 F.3d 1054, 1058 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (2000) (“The arbitrary and ca…
Cited (see also) · Fed. Cl. · signal: see also
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971) (citations omitted); see also Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight Sys., Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285 , 95 S.Ct. 438 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh’g denied, 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1340 , 1341, 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975); In re Sang-Su Lee, 277 F.3d at 1342 ; Advanced Data Concepts, Inc. v. United States, 216 F.3d 1054, 1058 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (2000) (“The arbitrary…
Cited (see also) · Fed. Cl. · signal: see also
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971) (citations omitted); see also Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight Sys., Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285 , 95 S.Ct. 438 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh’g denied, 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1340 , 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975); In re Sang-Su Lee, 277 F.3d at 1342 ; Advanced Data Concepts, Inc. v. United States, 216 F.3d 1054, 1058 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (2000) (“The arbitrary and c…
Cited (see also) · Fed. Cl. · signal: see also
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971) (citations omitted); see also Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight Sys., Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285 , 95 S.Ct. 438 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh’g denied, 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1340 , 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975); In re Sang-Su Lee, 277 F.3d at 1342; Advanced Data Concepts, Inc. v. United States, 216 F.3d 1054, 1058 (Fed.Cir. 2000) (“The arbitrary and capricious standar…
Cited (see also) · Fed. Cl. · signal: see also
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971) (citations omitted); see also Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight Sys., Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285 , 95 S.Ct. 438 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh’g denied, 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1340 , 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975); Advanced Data Concepts, Inc. v. United States, 216 F.3d 1054, 1058 (Fed.Cir.2000) (“The arbitrary and capricious standard applicable here is highly deferentia…
Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: see also
See also Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285-6 (1974), reh. denied, 420 U.S. 956 (1975).
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see also
See also Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285 , 95 S.Ct. 438, 441 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh’g denied, 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1340 , 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975); Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 , 91 S.Ct. 814, 823 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971).
Cited (see also) · N.C. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Bowman Trans. v. Arkansas-Best Freight, 419 U.S. 281 (1974), reh. denied, 420 U.S. 956 (1975) (“arbitrary and capricious” standard) (decision upheld if agency’s path in reaching it can reasonably be discerned from the record).
“arbitrary and capricious” standard