Cluster 9098294

See Kaplan v. County of Los Angeles, 894 F.2d 1076 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 907 , 110 S.Ct. 2590 , 110 L.Ed.2d 271 (1990); N.A.A.C.P., Los Angeles Branch v. Jones, 131 F.3d 1317 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 813 , 119 S.Ct. 48 , 142 L.Ed.2d 37 (1998).

See United States v. Sanders, 893 F.2d 133, 136 (7th Cir.) (explaining that admission of evidence regarding codefendant's guilty plea was not per se an abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 907 , 110 S.Ct. 2591 , 110 L.Ed.2d 272 (1990); United States v. Davis, 838 F.2d 909, 918 (7th Cir.1988) (The government may elicit evidence of a guilty plea to "blunt the impact of crossexamination and to avoid the impression that the government was concealing the information.”). 2…

See 893 F.2d 133 , 138-39 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 907 , 110 S.Ct. 2591 , 110 L.Ed.2d 272 (1990).

See United States v. Taylor, 882 F.2d 1018, 1029 (6th Cir.1989) (prohibiting "double-counting of multiple convictions arising from a single episode of criminal conduct."), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 907 (1990).

Unlike Walters, whose profits were to be derived from his legitimate contracts, Catalfo sought his profit-based on collateral fraudulently obtained from someone else. “[J]ust as it is embezzlement if an employee takes money from his employer and replaces it before it is missed, ... so it is fraud to impose an enormous risk of loss on one’s employer through deliberate misrepresentation even if the risk does not materialize.” United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d 163, 170 (7th Cir.)…

Indeed, the Fifth *4 Circuit rejected an interpretation identical to Mr. Carter’s, reasoning that such a “position only makes sense if one can really believe that Congress intended to differentiate the crimes of illegal possession and receipt or shipment in terms of different levels of involvement of interstate commerce.... [W]e find that construction so unlikely as to border on the absurd.” United States v. Shelton, 937 F.2d at 143 ; see also United States v. Merritt, 882 F…

See also United States v. Taylor, 882 F.2d 1018, 1031 (6th Cir.1989) (“[T]he ACCA announced not a new federal crime but a sentence enhancement, so that prior convictions were to be proven not to the jury at trial but to the bench at the sentencing phase.”), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 907 , 110 S.Ct. 2592 , 110 L.Ed.2d 273 (1990); United States v. Clawson, 831 F.2d 909, 914 (9th Cir.1987) (where defendant raised inadequate counsel as constitutional basis for challenge of prior co…

United States v. Brady, 988 F.2d 664 (6th Cir.1993) (en banc), petition for cert. filed, --- U.S.L.W. ---- (June 21, 1993); see also United States v. Taylor, 882 F.2d 1018, 1029 (6th Cir.1989) (burglaries of different structures on different dates were "committed on occasions different from one another" and were therefore properly counted as predicate convictions for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 907 (1990).

Elect., 277 Or 447, 456 , 561 P2d 154 (1977); see also Northwest Advancement v. Wage and Hour Comm., 96 Or App 146, 148 , 772 P2d 934 , rev den 308 Or 315 (1989), cert den 496 US 907 (1990).