How cited: Cluster 9447764 · Go Syfert

Cluster 9447764

green · 9 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
And a proceeding is “terminated when the status quo is altered and the rights and obligations of the parties are fixed.” In re Cal. Palms Addiction Recovery Campus, Inc., 87 F.4th 734, 740 (6th Cir. 2023) (quoting Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank, 575 U.S. 496, 502 (2015)) (cleaned up).
quoting Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank, 575 U.S. 496, 502 (2015)
Rule Authority · Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Pure Repair and Trucking LLC, 658 B.R. at 906; Cal Palms Addiction Recovery Campus, Inc. v. Vara (In re Cal. Palms Addiction Recovery Campus, Inc.), 87 F.4th 734, 740 (6th Cir. 2023); In re Creekside Senior Apts.
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Terry contends that the district court’s orders are final because she says her motion to dismiss was a “proceeding” that involved “a discrete dispute” with “specific procedural steps.” In re Cal. Palms Addiction Recovery Campus, Inc. (California Palms), 87 F.4th 734, 739 (6th Cir. 2023).
green Baum (2025)
Cited · E.D. Mich. · signal: see
See Cal. Palms Addiction Recovery Campus, Inc. v. Vara, 87 F.4th 734 , 739 n.2 (6th Cir. 2023) (finding standing based on the appellant suffering an adverse, pecuniary consequence “directly resulting from” the order on appeal, and citing Fid.
finding standing based on the appellant suffering an adverse, pecuniary consequence “directly resulting from” the order on appeal, and citing Fid. Bank, 77 F.3d at 882 , which applied the “person aggrieved” doctrine in its holding
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see
See Cal. Palms Addiction Recovery Campus, Inc. v. Vara (In re Cal. Palms Addiction Recovery Campus, Inc.), 87 F.4th 734 , 739 n.2 (6th Cir. 2023) (finding standing based on the appellant suffering “an adverse, pecuniary consequence” from the order on appeal (citing Fid.
finding standing based on the appellant suffering “an adverse, pecuniary consequence” from the order on appeal (citing Fid. Bank, 77 F.3d at 882 )
Cited (see also) · Bankr. E.D. Mich. · signal: see also
Reagan v. Wetzel (In re Reagan), 403 B.R. 614, 621 (8th Cir. BAP 2009) (quoting Loop Corp. v. U.S. Trustee, 290 B.R. 108, 112 (D.Minn. 2003)).” Creekside, 489 B.R. at 60 ; see also California Palms Addiction Recovery Campus, Inc. v. Vara (In re California Palms Addiction Recovery Campus, Inc.), 87 F.4th 734, 740 (6th Cir. 2023) (explaining that the court “need[ed] only to agree with one of [the four] causes [the bankruptcy court found to convert the case] to affirm”).
explaining that the court “need[ed] only to agree with one of [the four] causes [the bankruptcy court found to convert the case] to affirm”