Cluster 96066
green
· 394 citation events
across 49 courts.
Showing the 12 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
(PC) Abdullah v. Dacuycuy (2023)
Wesby, 138 24 S. Ct. at 590.
green
O'GRADY v. Superior Court (2006)
(Houghton v. Payne (1904) 194 U.S. 88, 96-97 [ 48 L.Ed. 888 , 24 S.Ct. 590 ] [holding literary series to constitute books and not periodical publications, for purposes of postal regulations, due to lack of “continuity of literary character, a connection between the different numbers of the series in the nature of the articles appearing in them”]; Fifield v. American Auto.
green
Telepages, Inc. v. Baldwin (1987)
Payne, 194 U.S. 88, 98 , 24 S.Ct. 590, 592 , 48 L.Ed. 888, 890 (1903).
green
Glover Construction Co. v. Andrus (1978)
Studebaker v. Perry, 184 U.S. 258, 268 [ 22 S.Ct. 463 , 46 L.Ed. 528 ], Houghton v. Payne, 194 U.S. 88, 99 [ 24 S.Ct. 590 , 48 L.Ed. 888 ].
emphasis added
(Riley v. Forbes, 193 Cal. 740, 745 [ 227 P. 768 ]; Hodge v. McCall, 185 Cal. 330, 334 [ 197 P. 86 ]; 23 Cal.Jur. 776; see Federal Trade Com. v. Gratz, 253 U.S. 421, 427 [ 40 S.Ct. 572 , 64 L.Ed. 993 ]; United States v. Dickson, 40 U.S. [15 Pet.] 141, 161, 162 [ 10 L.Ed. 689 ]; Houghton v. Payne, 194 U.S. 88, 99, 100 [ 24 S.Ct. 590 , 48 L.Ed. 888 ]; Koshland v. Helvering, 298 U.S. 441 [ 56 S.Ct. 767 , 80 L.Ed. 1268 , 105 A.L.R. 756 ]; Iselin v. United States, 270 U.S. 245 [ …
green
Gianinna Gallardo v. Mary Mayhew (2020)
See Houghton v. Payne, 194 U.S. 88, 99 (1904) (holding that a statute is ambiguous when it is “susceptible of two reasonable interpretations”); Freemanville Water Sys., Inc. v. Poarch Band of Creek Indians, 563 F.3d 1205, 1210 (11th Cir. 2009) (noting that the “very definition of ambiguity” is the existence of “two reasonable, competing interpretations” (emphasis added)).
green
Gianinna Gallardo v. Mary Mayhew (2020)
See Houghton v. Payne, 194 U.S. 88, 99 (1904) (holding that a statute is ambiguous when it is “susceptible of two reasonable interpretations”); Freemanville Water Sys., Inc. v. Poarch Band of Creek Indians, 563 F.3d 1205, 1210 (11th Cir. 2009) (noting that the “very definition of ambiguity” is the existence of “two reasonable, competing interpretations” (emphasis added)).
green
Gianinna Gallardo v. Mary Mayhew (2020)
See Houghton v. Payne, 194 U.S. 88, 99 (1904) (holding that a statute is ambiguous when it is “susceptible of two reasonable interpretations”); Freemanville Water Sys., Inc. v. Poarch Band of Creek Indians, 563 F.3d 1205, 1210 (11th Cir. 2009) (noting that the “very definition of ambiguity” is the existence of “two reasonable, competing interpretations” (emphasis added)).
See Houghton v. Payne, 194 U.S. 88, 99 , 24 S.Ct. 590 , 48 L.Ed. 888 (1904) (Statute is ambiguous when “susceptible of two reasonable interpretations”).
Statute is ambiguous when “susceptible of two reasonable interpretations”
A, §§ 200.0110, 200.0121 (July 1, 1988); see Houghton v. Paine (1904) 194 U.S. 88, 94-95 [ 48 L Ed 888, 889 , 24 S.Ct. 590 ].) Accordingly, the classification set forth in regulation 1590 is within the broad grant of interpretative power given to the Board by the Legislature.
green
Lukens Steel Co. v. Perkins (1939)
See also, Houghton v. Payne, 194 U.S. 88, 100 , 24 S.Ct. 590 , 48 L.Ed. 888 . [22] Swendig v. Washington Water Power Co., 265 U.S. 322, 331 , 44 S.Ct. 496 , 68 L.Ed. 1036 ; Wisconsin v. Illinois, 278 U.S. 367, 413 , 49 S.Ct. 163 , 73 L.Ed. 426 (thirty years). [23] Brewster v. Gage, 280 U.S. 327, 336, 337 , 50 S.Ct. 115 , 74 L.Ed. 457 . [24] Wisconsin v. Illinois, 278 U.S. 367, 414 , 49 S.Ct. 163 , 73 L.Ed. 426 . [25] Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp., 305 U.…
green
Lukens Steel Co. v. Perkins (1939)
See also, Houghton v. Payne, 194 U.S. 88, 100 , 24 S.Ct. 590 , 48 L.Ed. 888 .