Lee v. State, 404 So. 2d 860 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).
Search
Lee v. State, 404 So. 2d 860 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981). Book View Copy Cite
✓ Positive Treatment Affirmed 1 positive ▼
Robert Livingston LEE, Jr.
v.
STATE of Florida
No. ZZ-331.
District Court of Appeal of Florida.
Oct 16, 1981.
404 So. 2d 860
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant., Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and David P. Gauldin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
McCord, Mills, Smith.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Lee appeals an order that attempted to correct two illegal “split” sentences — of five years’ probation conditioned on two years’ incarceration — by imposing concurrent indeterminate sentences of two to five years. Imposition of a two-year minimum term for an indeterminate sentence was error, because section 921.18, Fla.Stat. (1979), limits the minimum term in such cases to six months. Cox v. State, 344 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), cert. den., 354 So.2d 979 (Fla.1977). Under Villery v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1981), the corrected sentences are otherwise proper. Therefore, the sentences are AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part. The case is REMANDED for correction of the sentences by imposing a minimum term of six months. Appellant need not be present for correction of the sentences.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.