Cases from cite.case.law:

PACK, v. STATE, 161 So. 3d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . contending that his sentence is illegal because the only lawful indeterminate sentence under section 921.18 . . .

A. KANTAINIS, v. STATE, 441 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . five to fifteen years imposed on Counts I and II, conceded by the State to be invalid under Section 921.18 . . .

G. GIBBS, v. STATE, 415 So. 2d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . See § 921.18, Florida Statutes (1981). . . .

D. BUTLER, v. STATE, 412 So. 2d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 921.18, Florida Statutes (1979), authorizing indeterminate sentences, is limited in application . . .

LEE, Jr. v. STATE, 404 So. 2d 860 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Imposition of a two-year minimum term for an indeterminate sentence was error, because section 921.18 . . .

JOHNSON, Jr. v. STATE, 399 So. 2d 108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . See Section 921.18, Florida Statutes (1979). . . .

BELL, v. STATE, 382 So. 2d 107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Fla.Stat. 921.18 (1979). Judgment affirmed, sentence reversed and remanded for resentencing. . . .

MORRIS, v. STATE, 377 So. 2d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . . § 921.18 Florida Statutes (1977). Cox v. State, 344 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1977). . . .

FULFORD, v. BLACKBURN,, 593 F.2d 17 (5th Cir. 1979)

. . . . § 921.18 (1961). . . . Fla.Stat. § 921.18 (1961), provided: Sentence for indeterminate period for non-capital felony. — Whenever . . .

STATE v. A. SMITH, III,, 360 So. 2d 21 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . F.S. 921.18. . . .

COX, v. STATE, 344 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . to give the appellant an “indeterminate sentence” the only lawful sentence allowable under Section 921.18 . . .

LANGDON, v. STATE, 330 So. 2d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . reasons: (1) That in imposing sentence, the trial court abused its discretion in failing to consider § 921.18 . . . have been aware that he could have sentenced the appellant to an indeterminate sentence, pursuant to § 921.18 . . .

JACKSON a k a v. STATE, 318 So. 2d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . § 921.18, with a recommendation for drug rehabilitation treatment while the appellant is confined to . . .

D. GIBSON, v. STATE, 315 So. 2d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . It appears that the trial court in its discretion sentenced appellant in accordance with Section 921.18 . . .

STATE v. DULL, 249 So. 2d 758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . Section 921.18, F.S.A., the trial court could have imposed on each of the appellees Hannah and Harrell . . . F.S. § 921.18, F.S.A. . . .

DeLOACH, v. STATE, 232 So. 2d 765 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . . § 921.18, F.S.A., the indeterminate punishment statute and the discussion of that section by the Supreme . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 232 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . Excluding probation and considering imprisonment only, compare F.S. 921.18, F.S.A., the indeterminate . . .

ANDERSON, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 158 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1963)

. . . Section 921.18-921.23, F.S.A.; Carnley v. Cochran, Fla.1960, 118 So.2d 629. . . .

J. D. CARNLEY, v. H. G. COCHRAN, Jr., 118 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 1960)

. . . sentence imposed by the trial judge in the forgery matter complied strictly with the provisions of Section 921.18 . . . Section 921.18, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., is merely an exercise of the legislative power to prescribe . . .

ADAMS, v. O. CULVER,, 111 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1959)

. . . the charge, judgment was entered, and he was sentenced under our “indeterminate sentence” statute, § 921.18 . . .

THE CHOCTAW NATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 91 Ct. Cl. 320 (Ct. Cl. 1940)

. . . plaintiff for $789,773.17, except such of the amounts as are stated in the alternative claim of $469,-921.18 . . .