Tucker v. State, 582 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Tucker v. State, 582 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 7659108.
Ernest TUCKER
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 90-02731.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jul 26, 1991.
582 So. 2d 825
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard Fechter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellee.
Danahy, Frank, Hall.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions but reverse the appellant’s habitual offender sentences and remand for resentencing. In order to be sentenced as a habitual offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.), a defendant must have successive felony convictions. The appellant’s two prior convictions were rendered on the same date, and so they should have been treated as a single offense. Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.