Friedman v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 652 So. 2d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).
Search
Friedman v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 652 So. 2d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995). Book View Copy Cite
Andrea B. FRIEDMAN
v.
UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
No. 94-1343.
District Court of Appeal of Florida.
Apr 5, 1995.
652 So. 2d 515
Andrea B. Friedman, North Lauderdale, and Mary Alice Gwynn of Saylor and Gwynn, West Palm Beach, for appellant., William T. Moore and John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellee, Unemployment Appeals Com’n.
Dell, Pariente, Warner.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We reverse the decision of the Unemployment Appeals Commission, which concluded, contrary to the appeals referee, that the claimant’s actions constituted misconduct connected with the work under section 443.036(26), Florida Statutes (1993). The claimant’s conduct on this single occasion was not willful, wanton, or deliberate, nor was it of such a degree as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design or to show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interests or of the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer. Moreover, unlike the conduct in appellee’s cited cases, it was not excessive, repeated, or following a warning, and it did not involve the claimant’s work or the employer’s interests.

REVERSED.

DELL, C.J., and WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.