Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Mitchell, 754 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Mitchell, 754 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Miami-Dade County v. Mitchell (fladistctapp, 2002-12-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Miami-Dade County v. Mitchell
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Miami-Dade County v. Mitchell, 754 So.2d 773, 774 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (remanding for reconsideration in light of Closet Maid v. Sykes, 763 So.2d 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)(en banc), to determine whether the workplace accident was the major contributing cause of the claimant’s need for future medical treatment)(“Mitchell I”); Mitchell v. Metro Dade, 797 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)(re-manding for the Judge of Compensation Claims (“JCC”) to afford claimant an opportunity to testify in person)(“Mitchell II”).
cited Cited "see" Mitchell v. Metro Dade
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Miami-Dade County v. Mitchell, 754 So.2d 773, 774 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, f/k/a Metropolitan Dade County
v.
Autheria MITCHELL
No. 1D98-3686.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 13, 2000.
754 So. 2d 773
Robert A. Ginsburg, Miami-Dade County Attorney; Marilyn B. Strauss, Assistant County Attorney, Miami, for Appellant., R. Cory Schnepper of Levine, Busch, Schnepper & Stein, P.A., Miami; B. Ellen Schnepper of Barbara E. Schnepper, P.A., Miami, for Appellee.
Kahn, Padovano, Webster.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, the self-insured employer appeals, and the claimant cross-appeals. Having carefully considered the plethora of issues raised, we reverse that portion of the order which directs the employer to pay for medical services provided by Dr. Abeckjerr from the date of the accident until February 14, 1997, because we conclude that it was an abuse of discretion to excuse the doctor’s failure to comply with the requirements of section 440.13(3)(a) and (4)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). (Section 440.13(2)(c) provides authority for that portion of the order which directs the employer to pay for services provided by the doctor from February 14, 1997, to the date of maximum medical improvement.) We also reverse that portion of the order which directs the employer to pay for future medical care, and remand for further consideration of whether the November 11, 1995, accident was the “major contributing cause” of the need for future treatment, in light of our recent decision in Closet Maid v. Sykes, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D459, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 155878 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 15, 2000) (en banc). In all other respects, we affirm.

Affirmed in part; reversed IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

KAHN,-WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.