Himes v. Schnably-Vickers, 949 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
Search
Himes v. Schnably-Vickers, 949 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Book View Copy Cite
Suzanne HIMES
v.
Truda SCHNABLY-VICKERS, Santa Fe Truss & Claims Center
No. 1D06-2777.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 24, 2007.
949 So. 2d 1072
Suzanne M. Himes, of Law Office of Suzanne M. Himes, P.A., Ocala, for Petitioner., Thomas Daniel Webb of McConnaugh-hay, Duffy, Coonrod, Pope & Weaver, P.A., Gainesville, for Respondents., Walter J. Havers, Senior Attorney, of the Offices of the Judge of Compensation Claims, Tallahassee, for JCC Jonathan D. Ohlman.
Benton, Browning, Ervin, III, Richard.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition asserting that the Judge of Compensation Claims abandoned the role of neutral arbiter in a hearing to set the amount of attorney’s fees to be awarded to claimant’s counsel. Specifically, petitioner complains that the JCC questioned the claimant about the fee award during the hearing.

Claimant sustained two accidents in 2001. Section 440.20(ll)(b), Florida Statutes (1999), requires the Judge of Compensation Claims to determine whether a settlement will be in the “best interest” of the claimant and authorizes the JCC to make or cause to be made such investigations as the JCC considers necessary. We determine that the inquiry made by the JCC in this case fell within that allowed by statute. Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

PETITION DENIED.

BROWNING, C.J., BENTON, J., and ERVIN, III, RICHARD W., Senior Judge, concur.