Cases citing this passage · Go Syfert

Cases citing this passage

a court should refrain from invalidating more of the statute than is necessary.

Cited 9 times across 3 cases. Most often attributed to Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Brock, 1987.

Timeline. First cited 2006  ·  peak 2006 (9 pins)  ·  last 2006  ·  spans 1 year  ·  100% of all citations are from the last 5 years  ·  growing
2006
Related passages — frequently cited in the same opinions as this one
co-cited 3×  certainly congress can provide more individual liberties in the federal realm than the constitution requires without violating vital separation of powers principles.
co-cited 3×  congress does not enforce a constitutional right by changing what that right is.
co-cited 3×  congress has plenary authority in all cases in which it has substantive legislative jurisdiction, so long as the exercise of that authority does not offend some other constitutional restriction.
co-cited 3×  e can conceive of no argument to support the contention that congress is incapable of amending the legislation that it has passed.
co-cited 3×  he eeoc's power to authorize private suits within 180 days undermines its express statutory duty to investigate every charge filed, as well as congress's unambiguous policy of encouraging informal re…
co-cited 3×  let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the l…
co-cited 3×  o say that a nondiscriminatory religious-practice exemption is permitted, or even that it is desirable, is not to say that it is constitutionally required.

Hankins v. Lyght - dissent  ·  2006-02-22  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites
Hankins v. Lyght  ·  2006-02-16  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites
Hankins v. Lyght  ·  2006-02-16  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites