In Re FOREST  ·  2025-04-03  ·  Federal Circuit  ·  pin 599 U.S. at 465

“Typically, we find clear-statement rules appropriate when a statute implicates historically or constitutionally grounded norms that we would not expect Congress to un- settle lightly.”

(HC) Griffin v. Doerer  ·  2025-01-27  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 599 U.S. at 465

“After AEDPA, as before it, the savings clause preserves recourse to § 2241 in cases 9 where unusual circumstances make it impossible or impracticable to seek relief in the sentencing 10 court, as well as for challenges to detention other than collateral attacks on a sentence.”

Seville Industries LLC v. U S Small Business Administration  ·  2024-02-20  ·  W.D. Louisiana  ·  pin 599 U.S. at 465

“[W]e interpret provisions of a statute in a manner that renders them compatible, not contradictory.”

Bruckner Truck Sales, Inc. v. Guzman  ·  2023-12-12  ·  N.D. Texas  ·  pin 599 U.S. at 465

“[W]e interpret provisions of a statute in a manner that renders them compatible, not contradictory.”

Jones v. Hendrix  ·  2023-06-22  ·  Supreme Court  ·  pin 599 U.S. at 465

“The issue raised on the hearing of a habeas corpus may be one of law simply”