Cases pin-citing Ballentine · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Ballentine

Cases pin-citing Ballentine

De Sylva v. Ballentine  ·  1956  ·  48 pinpoint citations from 16 cases, 11 distinct passages.

Cave Creek Unified School District v. Ducey  ·  2013-01-15  ·  Court of Appeals of Arizona  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
“[T]he word ‘or’ is often used as a careless substitute for the word ‘and’; that is, it is often used in phrases where ‘and’ would express the thought with greater clarity. That trouble with the word has been with us for a long time[.]”
Baloco Ex Rel. Tapia v. Drummond Co., Inc.  ·  2011-05-20  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
"The scope of a federal right is, of course, a federal question, but that does not mean that its content is not to be determined by state, rather than federal law."
Freddy Locarno Baloco v. Drummond Company, Inc.  ·  2011-02-03  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
“The scope of a federal right is, of course, a federal question, but that does not mean that its content is not to be determined by state, rather than federal law.”
Baloco Ex Rel. Tapia v. Drummond Co., Inc.  ·  2011-02-03  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
“The scope of a federal right is, of course, a federal question, but that does not mean that its content is not to be determined by state, rather than federal law.”
In the Matter of Brad Levenson  ·  2009-11-18  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
“[T]here is no federal law of domestic relations, which is primarily a matter of state concern.”
De George v. American Airlines, Inc.  ·  2009-06-30  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
“[TJhere is no federal law of domestic relations, which is primarily a matter of state concern.”
De George v. American Airlines, Inc.  ·  2009-06-30  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
“[TJhere is no federal law of domestic relations, which is primarily a matter of state concern.”
Ellen Devlin v. United States  ·  2003-12-22  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
“The scope of a federal right is, of course, a federal question, but that does not mean that its content is not to be determined by state, rather than federal law.”
United States v. Antonio L. Venable  ·  2001-11-16  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
“We start with the proposition that the word ‘or’ is often used as a careless substitute for the word ‘and.’ ”
Harbaugh v. Sweet (In Re Harbaugh)  ·  2001-01-23  ·  E.D. Michigan  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
“[T]here is no federal law of domestic relations, which is primarily a matter of state concern.”
Demko v. United States  ·  1999-06-18  ·  Federal Claims  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
“We start with the proposition that the word ‘or’ is often used as a careless substitute for the word ‘and’; that is, it is often used in phrases where ‘and’ would express the thought with greater clarity.”
John Marascalco, D/B/A Robin Hood Music v. Fantasy, Inc., D/B/A Jondora/parker Music  ·  1991-12-30  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
"[W]hat scant material there is indicates that no substantial changes in the Act were intended."
In Re Marriage of Lang  ·  1991-04-12  ·  Wisconsin Supreme Court  ·  pin 351 U.S. at 570
"beneficiaries under an insurance policy take by virtue of the contract of insurance rather than by the laws of succession"
Saroyan v. William Saroyan Foundation  ·  1987-12-18  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 100 L. Ed. at 570
“Each of these named classes is separated in the statute by a condition precedent to the passing of renewal rights, namely, that the persons named in the preceding class be deceased.”
United States v. David H. Moore  ·  1980-01-02  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 351 S. Ct. at 570
“the word ‘or’ is often used as a careless substitute for the word ‘and’; that is, it is often used in phrases where ‘and’ would express the thought with greater clarity”