Cases pin-citing Jackson v. Fidelity and Deposit Co.

Jackson v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. · 2005 · 6 pinpoint citations from 5 cases, 3 distinct passages.

Commonwealth of Virginia v. Sean Holmes, s/k/a Sean Jefferson Holmes · 2024-03-27 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · pin 269 Va. at 303

“Where the General Assembly has expressed its intent in clear and unequivocal terms, it is not the province of the judiciary to add words to the statute or alter its plain meaning.”

Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n · 2012-11-01 · Supreme Court of Virginia · pin 269 Va. at 303

"Courts cannot 'add language to the statute the General Assembly has not seen fit to include.' "

VIRGINIAN-PILOT MEDIA v. Dow Jones & Co. · 2010-09-16 · Supreme Court of Virginia · pin 269 Va. at 303

"[c]ourts cannot `add language to [a] statute the General Assembly has not seen fit to include'"

Jaynes v. Com. · 2008-09-12 · Supreme Court of Virginia · 2 pin-cites · pin 269 S.E.2d at 303

"Where the General Assembly has expressed its intent in clear and unequivocal terms, it is not the province of the judiciary to add words to the statute or alter its plain meaning."

Brian Alexander Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia · 2008-02-26 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · pin 269 Va. at 303

“Where the General Assembly has expressed its intent in clear and unequivocal terms, it is not the province of the judiciary to add words to the statute or alter its plain meaning.”