Cases pin-citing Freedman · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Freedman

Cases pin-citing Freedman

Freedman v. Maryland  ·  1965  ·  26 pinpoint citations from 12 cases, 9 distinct passages.

Bey v. Rasawehr (Slip Opinion)  ·  2020-06-16  ·  Ohio Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 13 L. Ed. 2d at 51
“because only a judicial determination in an adversary proceeding ensures the necessary sensitivity to freedom of expression, only a procedure requiring a judicial determination suffices to impose a valid final restraint”
Kissick v. Huebsch  ·  2013-07-08  ·  W.D. Wisconsin  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 13 L. Ed. 2d at 51
“In the area of freedom of expression it is well established that one has standing to challenge a statute on the ground that it delegates overly broad licensing discretion to an administrative office, whether or not . . . he applied for a license.”
Laki Kaahumanu v. State of Hawaii, Department Of  ·  2012-06-06  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  pin 13 L. Ed. 2d at 649
“[I]t is well established that one has standing to challenge a statute on the ground that it delegates overly broad licensing discretion to an administrative office, whether or not his conduct could be proscribed by a properly drawn statute, and whether or not he applied for a license.”
Ohio Citizen Action v. City of Englewood  ·  2012-02-02  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 13 L. Ed. 2d at 649
“[0]ne has standing to challenge a statute on the ground that it delegates overly *581 broad licensing discretion to an administrative office, whether or not his conduct could be proscribed by a properly drawn statute, and whether or not he applied for a license.”
Covenant Media of Illinois, L.L.C. v. City of Des Plaines, Illinois  ·  2005-06-08  ·  N.D. Illinois  ·  pin 13 L. Ed. 2d at 649
“It is well established that one has standing to challenge a statute on the ground that it delegates overly broad licensing discretion to an administrative office, whether or not his conduct could be proscribed by a properly drawn statute, and whether or not he applied for a license.”
Boss Capital v. City of Casselberry  ·  1999-09-03  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  pin 380 U.S. at 51
“final judicial determination on the merits”; “judicial resolution”
Boss Capital, Inc. v. City of Casselberry  ·  1999-09-03  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  pin 85 S. Ct. at 734
“final judicial determination on the merits”; “judicial resolution”
MacDonald v. Safir  ·  1998-11-19  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 13 L. Ed. 2d at 51
“How or whether Maryland is to incorporate the required procedural safeguards in the statutory scheme is, of course, for the State to decide.”
Irish Lesbian & Gay Organization v. Giuliani  ·  1996-12-18  ·  S.D. New York  ·  pin 13 L. Ed. 2d at 649
“[I]t is well established that one has standing to challenge a statute on the ground that it delegates overly broad licensing discretion to an administrative office, whether or not his conduct could be proscribed by a properly drawn statute, and whether or not he applied for a license.”
Irish Lesbian and Gay Organization v. Giuliani  ·  1996-03-14  ·  S.D. New York  ·  pin 13 L. Ed. 2d at 649
“[I]t is well established that one has standing to challenge a statute on the ground that it delegates overly broad licensing discretion to an administrative office, whether or not his conduct could be proscribed by a properly drawn statute, and whether or not he applied for a license.”
Richard Graff v. City of Chicago  ·  1993-04-15  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 13 L. Ed. 2d at 51
"one has standing to challenge a statute on the ground that it delegates overly broad licensing discretion"
In Re the Matter of the Search of Kitty's East, 735 E. Colfax Avenue, Denver, Colorado. Kitty's East v. United States  ·  1990-06-07  ·  Tenth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 13 L. Ed. 2d at 51
"Any restraint imposed in advance of a final judicial determination on the merits must similarly be limited to preservation of the status quo for the shortest fixed period compatible with sound judicial resolution."