Cases pin-citing Griffin · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Griffin

Cases pin-citing Griffin

Griffin v. California  ·  1965  ·  31 pinpoint citations from 19 cases, 16 distinct passages.

United States v. Mensah  ·  2024-08-02  ·  Second Circuit  ·  pin 380 U.S. at 609
“[T]he Fifth Amendment . . . forbids either comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence or instructions by the court that such silence is evidence of guilt.”
Malcolm McLaughlin v. State of Mississippi  ·  2022-05-17  ·  Court of Appeals of Mississippi  ·  pin 380 U.S. at 609
“[T]he Fifth Amendment, in its direct application to the Federal Government and in its bearing on the State by reason of the Fourteenth Amendment, forbids . . . comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence . . . .”
United States v. Lara  ·  2022-01-11  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  pin 380 U.S. at 609
“[T]he Fifth Amendment’s self-incrimination clause . . . preclude[s] the prosecution from arguing to the jury that the accused’s failure to testify at the trial [is] evidence of his guilt.”
State v. Tellis  ·  2020-12-30  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 14 L. Ed. 2d at 106
“It is improper for either the prosecutor or the court to comment on a defendant’s invocation of his right to remain silent.”
in Re: The Commitment of Maurice Bluitt  ·  2018-09-27  ·  Court of Appeals of Texas  ·  pin 380 U.S. at 609
“What the jury may infer, given no help from the court, is one thing. What it may infer when the court solemnizes the silence of the accused into evidence against him is quite another.”
in Re: The Commitment of Maurice Bluitt  ·  2018-07-12  ·  Court of Appeals of Texas  ·  pin 380 U.S. at 609
“What the jury may infer, given no help from the court, is one thing. What it may infer when the court solemnizes the silence of the accused into evidence against him is quite another.”
Brian Christopher Keith v. State  ·  2017-12-06  ·  Court of Appeals of Texas  ·  pin 380 U.S. at 609
“[T]he Fifth Amendment . . . forbids either comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence or instructions by the court that such silence is evidence of guilt.”
State of Tennessee v. Alexander Jackson  ·  2016-08-03  ·  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee  ·  pin 380 U.S. at 609
“A prosecutor is strictly prohibited from commenting on the defendant‟s decision not to testify.”
Brandon Cody Kihega v. State  ·  2013-01-11  ·  Court of Appeals of Texas  ·  pin 14 L. Ed. 2d at 106
“[T]he Fifth Amendment, in its direct application to the Federal Government, and in its bearing on the States by reason of the Fourteenth Amendment, forbids either comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence or instructions by the court that such silence is evidence of guilt[.]”
United States v. Whitten  ·  2010-06-30  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 14 L. Ed. 2d at 106
“[T]he Fifth Amendment ... forbids either comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence or instructions by the court that such silence is *199 evidence of guilt.”
United States v. Wilson  ·  2010-06-30  ·  Second Circuit  ·  pin 380 U.S. at 609
“[T]he Fifth Amendment . . . forbids either 18 comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence or 19 instructions by the court that such silence is evidence of 20 guilt.”
United States v. Libby  ·  2007-03-01  ·  District of Columbia  ·  pin 85 S. Ct. at 1229
“What the jury may infer, given no help from the court, is one thing. What it may infer when the court solemnizes the silence of the accused into evidence against him is quite another”
Burrell v. Commonwealth of VA  ·  2005-01-27  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  pin 14 L. Ed. 2d at 106
“[T]he Fifth Amendment, in its direct application to the Federal Government, and in its bearing on the States by reason of the Fourteenth Amendment, forbids either comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence or instructions by the court that such silence is evidence of guilt.”
Burrell v. Virginia  ·  2005-01-27  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  pin 14 L. Ed. 2d at 106
"[T]he Fifth Amendment, in its direct application to the Federal Government, and in its bearing on the States by reason of the Fourteenth Amendment, forbids either comment by the prosecution on the accused's silence or instructions by the court that such silence is evidence of guilt."
United States v. Ramon Velarde-Gomez  ·  2001-10-23  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 14 L. Ed. 2d at 106
“[C]omment on the refusal to testify is a remnant of the ‘inquisitorial system of criminal justice,’ which the Fifth Amendment outlaws.”
Peyer v. Duncan  ·  2001-05-01  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 14 L. Ed. 2d at 106
“Griffin error”
United States v. Leonard D. Triplett  ·  1999-10-28  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 14 L. Ed. 2d at 106
“[w]e ... hold that the Fifth Amendment, in its direct application to the Federal Government ... forbids ... comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence”
United States v. Rodrigues  ·  1999-09-28  ·  E.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 14 L. Ed. 2d at 106
“[T]he Fifth Amendment ... forbids either comment by the. prosecution on the accused’s silence or instructions by the court that such silence is evidence of guilt.”
Parker v. Turpin  ·  1999-08-13  ·  N.D. Georgia  ·  pin 14 L. Ed. 2d at 106
“[T]he Fifth amendment in its direct application to the Federal Government and in its bearing on the States by reason of the Fourteenth Amendment, forbids either comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence or instructions by the court that such silence is evidence of guilt.”