Cases pin-citing Benton · Go Syfert

Cases pin-citing Benton

Benton v. Maryland  ·  1969  ·  29 pinpoint citations from 10 cases, 9 distinct passages.


State v. Frantz  ·  2022-12-30  ·  Supreme Court of Kansas  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
"Like the right to trial by jury, [the prohibition on double jeopardy] is clearly 'fundamental to the American scheme of justice.'"
Carman v. State  ·  2018-06-18  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  pin 89 S. Ct. at 2056
“[W]e today find that the double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment represents a fundamental ideal in our constitutional heritage, and that it should apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment.”
Carman v. State  ·  2018-06-18  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
"[W]e today find that the double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment represents a fundamental ideal in our constitutional heritage, and that it should apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment."
Johnson v. State  ·  2014-06-27  ·  Alaska Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
"[Wle today find that the double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment represents a fundamental ideal in our constitutional heritage, and that it should apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment."
People v. Aceval  ·  2009-01-07  ·  Michigan Court of Appeals  ·  4 pin-cites  ·  pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
"we today find that the double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment represents a fundamental ideal in our constitutional heritage, and that it should apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment"
Ex Parte Benford  ·  2006-01-27  ·  Supreme Court of Alabama  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
"[T]he double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment represents a fundamental ideal in our constitutional heritage, and... it should apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment."
Tobias D-Hun Kelson v. State  ·  2005-06-29  ·  Court of Appeals of Texas  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
" Bauder I"
State v. Baum  ·  2003-06-16  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
“[T]he double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment represents a *214 fundamental ideal in our constitutional heritage, and ... should apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment”
State v. Lonergan  ·  1989-11-28  ·  Supreme Court of Connecticut  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
“the fundamental nature of the guarantee against double jeopardy can hardly be doubted”
State v. Stewart  ·  1974-11-13  ·  Supreme Court of Iowa  ·  4 pin-cites  ·  pin 395 S. Ct. at 784
"petitioner's larceny conviction cannot stand once federal double jeopardy standards are applied"