Cases pin-citing Benton
Benton v. Maryland · 1969 · 29 pinpoint citations from 10 cases, 9 distinct passages.
State v. Frantz
· 2022-12-30 · Supreme Court of Kansas · 3 pin-cites
· pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
"Like the right to trial by jury, [the prohibition on double jeopardy] is clearly 'fundamental to the American scheme of justice.'"
Carman v. State
· 2018-06-18 · Supreme Court of Georgia · pin 89 S. Ct. at 2056
“[W]e today find that the double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment represents a fundamental ideal in our constitutional heritage, and that it should apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment.”
Carman v. State
· 2018-06-18 · Supreme Court of Georgia · 2 pin-cites
· pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
"[W]e today find that the double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment represents a fundamental ideal in our constitutional heritage, and that it should apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment."
Johnson v. State
· 2014-06-27 · Alaska Supreme Court · 3 pin-cites
· pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
"[Wle today find that the double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment represents a fundamental ideal in our constitutional heritage, and that it should apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment."
People v. Aceval
· 2009-01-07 · Michigan Court of Appeals · 4 pin-cites
· pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
"we today find that the double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment represents a fundamental ideal in our constitutional heritage, and that it should apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment"
Ex Parte Benford
· 2006-01-27 · Supreme Court of Alabama · 3 pin-cites
· pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
"[T]he double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment represents a fundamental ideal in our constitutional heritage, and... it should apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment."
Tobias D-Hun Kelson v. State
· 2005-06-29 · Court of Appeals of Texas · 3 pin-cites
· pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
" Bauder I"
State v. Baum
· 2003-06-16 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 3 pin-cites
· pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
“[T]he double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment represents a *214 fundamental ideal in our constitutional heritage, and ... should apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment”
State v. Lonergan
· 1989-11-28 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · 3 pin-cites
· pin 23 L. Ed. 2d at 707
“the fundamental nature of the guarantee against double jeopardy can hardly be doubted”
State v. Stewart
· 1974-11-13 · Supreme Court of Iowa · 4 pin-cites
· pin 395 S. Ct. at 784
"petitioner's larceny conviction cannot stand once federal double jeopardy standards are applied"