Cases pin-citing Conrad

Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad · 1975 · 80 pinpoint citations from 26 cases, 23 distinct passages.

Thompson v. Ragland · 2022-01-26 · Tenth Circuit · pin 420 U.S. at 546

“The presumption against prior restraints is heavier—and the degree of protection broader—than that against limits on expression imposed by criminal penalties.”

Donald Burns v. Town of Palm Beach · 2021-06-08 · Eleventh Circuit · pin 420 U.S. at 546

“By its nature, theater usually is the acting out—or singing out—of the written word, and frequently mixes speech with live action or conduct. But that is no reason to hold theater subject to a drastically different standard.”

Stephen Kolbe v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr. · 2016-02-04 · Fourth Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“[0]ne is not to have the exercise of liberty of expression in appropriate places abridged on the plea that it may be exercised in some other place.”

Jornaleros de Las Palmas v. City of League City · 2013-05-17 · S.D. Texas · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“Whether petitioner might have used some other, privately owned, theater in the city for the production is of no consequence.”

Comite De Jornaleros De Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo Beach · 2011-09-16 · Ninth Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“Whether petitioner might have used some other, privately owned, theater in the city for the production is of no consequence.”

Child Evangelism Fellowship of Maryland, Inc. v. Montgomery County Public Schools · 2006-08-10 · Fourth Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“[T]he danger of censorship and of abridgment of our precious First Amendment freedoms is too great where officials have unbridled discretion over a forum’s use.”

Marc D. Mezibov v. Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Ohio · 2005-06-16 · Sixth Circuit · 6 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

"Any system of prior restraint... comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity."

Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Town Board of Windham · 2005-01-05 · N.D. New York · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“Each medium of expression ... must be assessed for First Amendment purposes by standards suited to it, for each may present its own problems.”

In re the Marriage of Suggs · 2004-07-08 · Washington Supreme Court · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“It is always difficult to know in advance what an individual will say, and the line between legitimate and illegitimate speech is often so finely drawn that the risks of freewheeling censorship are formidable.”

Talk of Town v. Department of Finance & Business Services ex rel. City of Las Vegas · 2003-09-10 · Ninth Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“Any system of prior restraint ... comes to' this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity.”

United States v. Schiff · 2003-06-16 · D. Nevada · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“Any system of prior restraint, however, ‘comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity.’ ”

United States v. Bell · 2003-01-10 · M.D. Pennsylvania · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“Any system *703 of prior restraint, however, ‘comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity.’ ”

State v. Evenson · 2001-10-30 · Court of Appeals of Arizona · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“Each medium of expression, of course, must be assessed for First Amendment purposes by standards suited to it, for each may present its own problems.”

Mainstream Loudoun v. Board of Trustees of Loudoun County Library · 1998-11-23 · E.D. Virginia · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“Whatever the reasons may have been for the board’s exclu *569 sion of the musical, it could not escape the obligation to afford appropriate procedural safeguards. We need not decide whether the ... production is in fact obscene”

Harman v. City of New York · 1998-03-19 · Second Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“[A] free society prefers to punish the few who abuse rights of speech after they break the law than to throttle them and all others beforehand”

Harman v. City Of New York · 1998-03-19 · Second Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

"[A] free society prefers to punish the few who abuse rights of speech after they break the law than to throttle them and all others beforehand."

Richard Graff v. City of Chicago, an Illinois Corporation · 1993-11-24 · Seventh Circuit · 6 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

"Each medium of expression, of course, must be assessed for First Amendment purposes by standards suited to it, for each may present its own problems"

Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia v. United States · 1993-08-24 · E.D. Virginia · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“Each medium of expression ... must be assessed for First Amendment purposes by standards suited to it, for each may present its own problems.”

Act-Up v. Walp · 1991-02-06 · M.D. Pennsylvania · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“All [the prior restrictions] had this in common: they gave public officials the power to deny use of a forum in advance of actual expression.”

United States v. Gilbert · 1989-06-22 · N.D. Georgia · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“[A] free society prefers to punish the few who abuse rights of speech after they break the law than to throttle them and all others beforehand.”

Matter of Felmeister · 1984-02-29 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · 4 pin-cites · pin 420 S. Ct. at 546

"Each medium of expression * * * must be assessed for First Amendment purposes by standards suited to it, for each may present its own problems."

Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp. · 1976-06-03 · Third Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 420 L. Ed. 2d at 448

“The presumption against prior restraints is heavier — and the degree of protection broader — than that against limits on expression imposed by criminal penalties”

Page 1 of 2 Next →