Cases pin-citing Steagald

Steagald v. United States · 1981 · 84 pinpoint citations from 32 cases, 29 distinct passages.

Lege v. City of Ketchikan, Alaska · 2021-12-16 · D. Alaska · pin 451 U.S. at 204

“[A]bsent exigent circumstances or consent, an entry into a private dwelling to conduct a search or effect an arrest is unreasonable without a warrant.”

Lane v. District of Columbia · 2016-09-30 · District of Columbia · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“[WJarrantless searches of a home are impermissible absent consent or exigent circumstances.”

United States v. Edward Robinson · 2015-08-18 · Ninth Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“In routine search cases ... the short time required to obtain a search warrant from a magistrate will seldom hinder efforts ... if a magistrate is not nearby, a telephonic search warrant can usually be obtained.”

Kenneth Lee Douds v. State · 2014-06-05 · Court of Appeals of Texas · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“In routine search cases such as this, the short time required to obtain a search warrant from a magistrate will seldom hinder efforts to apprehend a felon. Finally, if a magistrate is not nearby, a telephonic search warrant can usually be obtained.”

United States v. Turner · 2014-06-02 · S.D. New York · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“Except in ... special situations, we have consistently held that the entry into a home to conduct a search or make an arrest is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment unless done pursuant to a warrant.”

Meisler v. State · 2014-04-03 · Nevada Supreme Court · 2 pin-cites · pin 451 U.S. at 204

"Because an arrest warrant authorizes the police to deprive a person of his liberty, it necessarily also authorizes a limited invasion of that person's privacy interest when it is necessary to arrest him in his home."

United States v. Parson · 2009-02-25 · W.D. Pennsylvania · 2 pin-cites · pin 101 S. Ct. at 204

“Except in such special situations, we have consistently held that the entry into a home to conduct a search or make an arrest is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment unless done pursuant to a warrant.”

United States v. Kent · 2008-07-07 · Eighth Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“[T]he warrant embodied a judicial finding that there was probable cause to believe the [defendant] had committed a felony.”

Fisher v. City of San Jose · 2007-11-20 · Ninth Circuit · 6 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

"The purpose of a warrant is to allow a neutral judicial officer to assess whether the police have probable cause to make an arrest or conduct a search."

United States v. Gooch · 2007-11-01 · Ninth Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“Because an arrest warrant authorizes the police to deprive a person of liberty, it necessarily also authorizes a limited invasion of that person’s privacy interest when it is necessary to arrest him in his home.”

United States v. Gooch · 2007-11-01 · Ninth Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

State v. Hatchie · 2007-09-06 · Washington Supreme Court · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“[A]n arrest warrant authorizes ... a limited invasion of that person’s privacy interest when it is necessary to arrest him in his home.”

State v. Hatchie · 2007-09-06 · Washington Supreme Court · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

"[A]n arrest warrant authorizes . . . a limited invasion of that person's privacy interest when it is necessary to arrest him in his home."

Douglas McClish v. Richard B. Nugent · 2007-04-11 · Eleventh Circuit · 2 pin-cites · pin 68 L. Ed. 2d at 38

"Under the common law, a privilege attaches to the outer door of a dwelling, because . . . it is the owner's castle . . . . Thus, an open outer door was apparently regarded as the equivalent of a consent of the occupant for the constable to enter the home and conduct a search."

United States v. Long Huang You · 2002-02-28 · S.D. New York · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“[A]bsent exigent circumstances or consent, an entry into a private dwelling to conduct a search or effect an arrest is unreasonable without a warrant.”

State v. Ross · 2001-07-09 · Tennessee Supreme Court · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

"The Government ... may lose its right to raise factual issues of this sort ... when it has made contrary assertions *852 in the courts below...."

State of Tennessee v. Peter Allen Ross - Dissenting · 2001-07-09 · Tennessee Supreme Court · pin 451 U.S. at 204

“The Government . . . may lose its right to raise factual issues of this sort . . . when it has made contrary assertions in the courts below . . . .”

United States v. Collazo-Aponte · 2000-06-27 · First Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“Because an arrest warrant authorizes the police to deprive a person of his liberty, it necessarily also authorizes a limited invasion of that person’s privacy interest when it is necessary to arrest him in his home.”

United States v. Rivera-Melendez · 2000-06-27 · First Circuit · pin 451 U.S. at 204

Walters v. City of Andalusia · 2000-02-16 · M.D. Alabama · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“[Wjarrantless searches” are unreasonable “absent consent or exigent circumstances .... ”

Williams v. Lee County Sheriff's Dept. · 1999-07-29 · Mississippi Supreme Court · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

"an arrest warrant alone will suffice to enter a suspect's own residence to effect his arrest."

DiNicola v. DiPaolo · 1998-03-31 · W.D. Pennsylvania · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“[A]bsent exigent circumstances or consent, an entry into a private dwelling to conduct a search or effectuate an arrest is unreasonable without a warrant.”

James Joseph Williams v. Lee County, Mississippi · 1998-01-06 · Mississippi Supreme Court · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

"an arrest warrant alone will suffice to enter a suspect's own residence to effect his arrest."

United States v. Marvin Gene Rivers · 1996-12-24 · Ninth Circuit · pin 451 U.S. at 204

"an open outer door was apparently regarded as the equivalent of a consent of the occupant for the constable to enter the home and conduct a search."

State v. Santiago · 1993-02-09 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“warrantless entry of a home would be justified if the police were in ‘hot pursuit’ of a fugitive”

United States v. Sanusi · 1992-12-07 · E.D. New York · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“The Fourth Amendment was intended partly to protect against the abuses of the general warrants that had occurred in England and of the writs of assistance used in the colonies.”

United States of America, in No. 89-5510 v. Gaetano Vastola, in No. 89-5372 v. Elias Saka, in No. 89-5383 · 1990-10-02 · Third Circuit · pin 68 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“The government, however, may lose its right to raise factual issues ... when it has made contrary assertions in the courts below, when it has acquiesced in contrary findings by those courts, or when it has failed to raise such questions in a timely fashion during the litigation.”

Buie v. State · 1988-11-28 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · 4 pin-cites · pin 101 S. Ct. at 204

"`[T]he Fourth Amendment has drawn a firm line at the entrance to the house.'"

United States v. John Mabry, Debra Mabry, and Roger Sanders · 1987-03-03 · Tenth Circuit · 2 pin-cites · pin 68 L. Ed. 2d at 38

"absent exigent circumstances the magistrate, rather than the police officer, must make the decision that probable cause exists"

United States v. James David Kimmel · 1984-08-28 · Ninth Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“The Government ... may lose its right to raise factual issues of this sort before this Court ... when it has failed to raise such questions in a timely fashion during the litigation.”

United States v. Martinez-Torres · 1982-11-05 · S.D. New York · pin 68 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“The search at issue here took place in the absence of exigent circumstances. Except in such special situations, we have consistently held that the entry into a home to conduct a search or make an arrest is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment unless pursuant to a warrant.”

United States v. Tyrone McEachin · 1981-12-22 · D.C. Circuit · 3 pin-cites · pin 101 L. Ed. 2d at 38

“In routine search cases . . . the short time required to obtain a search warrant from a magistrate will seldom hinder efforts to apprehend a felon. ... [I]f a magistrate is not nearby, a telephonic search warrant can usually be obtained.”

Page 1 of 2 Next →