Cases pin-citing Heckler · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Heckler

Cases pin-citing Heckler

Heckler v. Campbell  ·  1983  ·  30 pinpoint citations from 12 cases, 5 distinct passages.

Geathers v. Berryhill  ·  2019-09-18  ·  S.D. New York  ·  pin 461 U.S. at 458
“If an individual’s capabilities are not described accurately by a rule, the regulations make clear that the individual’s particular limitations must be considered.”
Geathers v. Berryhill  ·  2019-08-12  ·  S.D. New York  ·  pin 461 U.S. at 458
“If an individual’s capabilities are not described accurately by a rule, the regulations make clear that the individual’s particular limitations must be considered.”
Rousey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.  ·  2018-01-11  ·  S.D. Illinois  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 103 L. Ed. 2d at 66
"If an individual's capabilities are not described accurately by a rule, the regulations make clear that the individual's particular limitations must be considered."
Ryan v. Astrue  ·  2014-03-18  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 103 L. Ed. 2d at 66
“If an individual’s capabilities are not described accurately by a rule, the regulations make clear that the individual’s particular limitations must be considered.”
Norman v. Astrue  ·  2012-09-25  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 103 L. Ed. 2d at 66
“If an individual’s capabilities are not described accurately by a rule, the regulations make clear that the individual’s particular limitations must be considered.”
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2010-07-21  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 103 L. Ed. 2d at 66
“If an individual’s capabilities are not described accurately by a rule, the regulations make clear that the individual’s particular limitations must be considered.”
Sykes v. Apfel  ·  2000-09-18  ·  Third Circuit  ·  pin 103 S. Ct. at 1952
“[E]ven where an agency’s enabling statute expressly requires it to hold a hearing, the agency may rely on its rulemaking authority to determine issues that do not require case-by-case determination.”
Cosby v. Ward  ·  1988-03-14  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 103 L. Ed. 2d at 66
“even where an agency’s enabling statute expressly requires it to hold a hearing, the agency may rely on its rulemaking authority to determine issues that do not require case-by-case consideration”
Cosby v. Ward  ·  1988-03-14  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 103 L. Ed. 2d at 66
"even where an agency's enabling statute expressly requires it to hold a hearing, the agency may rely on its rulemaking authority to determine issues that do not require case-by-case consideration"
Wooldridge v. Bowen  ·  1987-04-15  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 103 L. Ed. 2d at 66
“[i]f an individual’s capabilities are not described accurately by [the ‘grids’], the regulations make clear that the individual’s particular limitations must be considered”
Eugene WARMOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee  ·  1986-09-02  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 103 L. Ed. 2d at 66
“[T]he regulations provide that the rules [of the grid] will be applied only when they describe a claimant’s abilities and limitations accurately.”