Cases pin-citing White · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing White

Cases pin-citing White

White v. Illinois  ·  1992  ·  79 pinpoint citations from 26 cases, 18 distinct passages.

David Charles Wanke, Sr. v. State of Indiana  ·  2024-03-25  ·  Indiana Court of Appeals  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“a statement made in the course of procuring medical services, where the declarant knows that a false statement may cause misdiagnosis or mistreatment, carries special guarantees of credibility”
Reginald Blackburn v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)  ·  2018-08-01  ·  Indiana Court of Appeals  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 S. Ct. at 346
“a statement made in the course of procuring medical services, where the declarant knows that a false statement may cause misdiagnosis or mistreatment, carries special guarantees of credibility”
Termination: TF v. Indiana Department of Child Services  ·  2017-02-14  ·  Indiana Court of Appeals  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 736
“a statement made in the course of procuring medical services, where the declarant knows that a false statement may cause misdiagnosis or mistreatment, carries special guarantees of credibility”
United States v. Bowen  ·  2017-02-08  ·  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“a statement that qualifies for admission under a ‘firmly rooted’ hearsay exception is so trustworthy that adversarial testing can be expected to add little to its reliability”
State of Iowa v. Trent D. Smith  ·  2016-03-04  ·  Supreme Court of Iowa  ·  pin 116 L. Ed. 2d at 848
“[A] statement made in the course of procuring medical services, where the declarant knows that a false statement may cause misdiagnosis or mistreatment, carries special guarantees of credibility that a trier of fact may not think replicated by courtroom testimony.”
State of Iowa v. Trent D. Smith  ·  2016-03-04  ·  Supreme Court of Iowa  ·  pin 116 L. Ed. 2d at 848
“[A] statement made in the course of procuring medical services, where the declarant knows that a false statement may cause misdiagnosis or mistreatment, carries special guarantees of credibility that a trier of fact may not think replicated by courtroom testimony.”
State of Louisiana v. David J. Koederitz  ·  2015-03-17  ·  Supreme Court of Louisiana  ·  4 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 736
“[A] statement made in the course of procuring medical services, where the declarant knows that a false statement may cause misdiagnosis or mistreatment, carries special guarantees of credibility that a trier of fact may not think replicated by courtroom testimony.”
Lonnie C. Mclaury v. The State of Wyoming  ·  2013-07-18  ·  Wyoming Supreme Court  ·  4 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 736
"[A] statement made in the course of procuring medical services, where the declarant knows that a false statement may cause misdiagnosis or mistreatment, carries special guarantees of credibility that a trier of fact may not think replicated by courtroom testimony."
Gerald P. VanPatten v. State of Indiana  ·  2013-05-02  ·  Indiana Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“a statement made in the course of procuring medical services, where the declarant knows that a false statement may cause misdiagnosis or mistreatment, carries special guarantees of credibility”
Doali-Miller v. Supervalu, Inc.  ·  2012-04-11  ·  D. Maryland  ·  pin 502 U.S. at 346
“[A] statement made in the course of procuring medical services, where the declarant knows that a false statement may cause misdiagnosis or mistreatment, carries special guarantees of credibility.”
State v. Mendez  ·  2010-10-07  ·  New Mexico Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 736
“[A] statement made in the course of procuring medical services, where the declarant knows that a false statement may cause misdiagnosis or mistreatment, carries special guarantees of credibility that a trier of fact may not think replicated by courtroom testimony.”
Tracy v. Olson  ·  2005-11-30  ·  D. Massachusetts  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“[tjhere can be no doubt” that the hearsay exception for spontaneous declarations is “firmly rooted”
State v. Smith  ·  2005-08-30  ·  Supreme Court of Connecticut  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“[s]o understood, Roberts stands for the proposition that unavailability analysis is a necessary part of the [c]onfrontation [c]lause inquiry only when the challenged out-of-court statements were made in the course of a prior judicial proceeding”
Fiorentino v. RIO MAR ASSOCIATES, LP, SE  ·  2005-08-09  ·  D. Puerto Rico  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“Excited utterances are considered reliable because the declarant has not had the opportunity to reflect on the consequence of his exclamation.”
Brandt v. Curtis  ·  2005-07-07  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“There can be no doubt that the two exceptions we consider in this case [for spontaneous declarations and statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment] are ‘firmly rooted.’ ”
Marvin Howard Bockting v. Robert Bayer  ·  2005-02-22  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
"There is ... no basis for importing the `necessity requirement' announced in[ Craig and Coy ] into the much different context of out-of-court declarations...."
Haywood v. Portuando  ·  2003-09-19  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“[W]here proffered hearsay has sufficient guarantees of reliability to come within a firmly rooted exception to the hearsay *470 rule, the Confrontation Clause is satisfied.”
State v. Jordan  ·  2003-06-11  ·  Supreme Court of Iowa  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 S. Ct. at 346
“[Wlhere proffered hearsay has sufficient guarantees of reliability to come within a firmly *880 rooted exception to the hearsay rule, the Confrontation Clause is satisfied.”
Jones v. State  ·  2002-12-05  ·  Court of Appeals of Texas  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“[A] statement made in the course of procuring medical services, where the declarant knows that a false statement may cause misdiagnosis or mistreatment, carries special guarantees of credibility.”
Moore v. State  ·  2002-08-21  ·  Court of Appeals of Texas  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
"[A] statement made in the course of procuring medical services, where the declarant knows that a false statement may cause misdiagnosis or mistreatment, carries special guarantees of credibility."
Willie Brumley v. Curtis Wingard  ·  2001-10-11  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“Roberts stands for the proposition that unavailability analysis is a necessary part of the Confrontation Clause inquiry ... when the challenged out-of-court statements were made in the course of a prior judicial proceeding.”
Eldred, Eric v. Ashcroft, John D.  ·  2001-07-13  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“We consider as a preliminary matter an argument not considered below but urged by the United States as amicus curiae in support of respondent.”
Guidry v. State  ·  1999-12-15  ·  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
"where proffered hearsay has sufficient guarantees of reliability to come within a firmly rooted exception to the hearsay rule, the Confrontation Clause is satisfied"
State v. Burdette  ·  1999-04-05  ·  Supreme Court of South Carolina  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“The exception for spontaneous declarations is at least two centuries old, and may date to the late 17th century.”
United States v. Kayne  ·  1996-07-24  ·  First Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“Unavailability analysis is a necessary part of the Confrontation Clause inquiry only when the challenged out-of-court statements were made in the course of a prior judicial proceeding.”
State v. Medina  ·  1994-06-21  ·  Arizona Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 112 L. Ed. 2d at 346
“unavailability analysis is a necessary part of the Confrontation Clause inquiry only when the challenged out-of-court statements were made in the course of a prior judicial proceeding”
Page 1 of 2   Next →