Cases pin-citing Dunnigan · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Dunnigan

Cases pin-citing Dunnigan

United States v. Dunnigan  ·  1993  ·  65 pinpoint citations from 26 cases, 17 distinct passages.

United States v. Sonny Austin Ramdeo  ·  2017-03-14  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“The district court’s determination that [an] enhancement is required is sufficient ... if ... the court makes a finding of an obstruction of, or impediment to, justice that encompasses all of the factual predicates for a finding of perjury.”
United States v. Brown  ·  2016-12-14  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  pin 113 S. Ct. at 1111
“Section 3C1.1 requires specific intent to obstruct justice.”
United States v. Charles Thomas  ·  2016-08-15  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“[A] defendant’s right to testify does not include a right to commit perjury.”
United States v. Marcos Soto-Mendoza  ·  2016-02-25  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“[/// a defendant objects to a sentence enhancement resulting from her trial testimony, a district court must review the evidence and make independent findings necessary to establish a wiliful impediment to or obstruction of justice”
United States v. Trevor Alexander Watson  ·  2015-07-27  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“Respondent cannot contend that increasing her sentence because of her perjury interferes with her right to testify, for we have held on a number of occasions that a defendant’s right to testify does not include a right to commit perjury.”
United States v. Matias Lopez-Fernandez  ·  2014-07-03  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“[A] defendant’s right to testify does not include a right to commit perjury.”
State v. Ruggiero  ·  2014-05-12  ·  Idaho Court of Appeals  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 445
“To uphold the integrity of our trial system ... the constitutionality of perjury statutes is unquestioned”
People v. Farmer  ·  2011-06-01  ·  Appellate Court of Illinois  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 122 L. Ed. 2d at 87
"[A] defendant's right to testify does not include a right to commit perjury."
United States v. Spagnola  ·  2011-01-21  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“[N]ot every accused who testifies at trial and is convicted will incur an enhanced sentence under § 3C1.1 for committing perjury.”
United States v. Raplinger  ·  2009-02-11  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“The district court’s determination that enhancement is required is sufficient [if] ... the court makes a finding of an obstruction of, or impediment to, justice that encompasses all of the factual predicates for a finding of perjury.”
United States v. Benkahla  ·  2008-06-23  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“[A] defendant’s right to testify does not include a right to commit perjury.”
Anderson v. State  ·  2008-04-08  ·  Court of Appeals of Minnesota  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“All testimony, from third-party witnesses and the accused, has greater value because of the witness’ oath and the obligations or penalties attendant to it.”
United States v. Pounpanya  ·  2007-01-16  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“It is sufficient for the district court to make a finding of an obstruction of justice that encompasses the factual predicates for a finding of perjury”
United States v. Allen  ·  2003-08-26  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“Upon a proper determination that the accused has committed perjury at trial, an enhancement of sentence[for obstruction of justice] is required by the Sentencing Guidelines.”
United States v. Michael Eugene Jones, A/K/A Big Mike  ·  2002-10-28  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 122 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“Both parties assume the phrase ‘impede or obstruct the administration of justice’ includes perjury, and the commentary to § 3C1.1 is explicit in so providing.”
United States v. Palma  ·  2001-04-11  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“Upon a proper determination that the accused has committed perjury at trial, an enhancement of sentence is required by the Sentencing Guidelines.”
United States v. Anthony Hall and Scott Walker  ·  2000-05-16  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“A witness testifying under oath or affirmation [commits perjury] if he or she gives false testimony concerning a material matter with the willful intent to provide false testimony, rather than as a result of confusion, mistake or faulty memory.”
United States v. Roger G. Galbraith  ·  2000-01-11  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“[I]f a defendant objects to a sentence enhancement resulting from her trial testi *1014 mony, a district court must review the evidence and make independent findings .... ”
United States v. Gary  ·  1996-01-05  ·  First Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 445
“A witness testifying under oath or affirmation [commits criminal perjury] if she gives false testimony concerning a material matter with the willful intent to provide false testimony, rather than as a result of confusion, mistake or faulty memory.”
United States v. William Wise Murray, United States of America v. Misjaanda Diszelle Johnson  ·  1995-09-21  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 445
“[I]t is preferable for a district court to address each element of the alleged perjury in a separate and clear finding.”
United States v. Jerry A. Moore  ·  1994-06-22  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 445
“a defendant’s right to testify does not include the right to commit perjury”
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit  ·  1994-04-14  ·  Third Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 445
"Upon a proper determination that the accused has committed perjury at trial, an enhancement of sentence is required by [Sec. 3C1.1 of] the Sentencing Guidelines."
United States v. Porat  ·  1994-03-03  ·  Third Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 445
“Upon a proper determination that the accused has committed perjury at trial, an enhancement of sentence is required by [§ 3C1.1 of] the Sentencing Guidelines.”
United States v. Roland Eugene Butler  ·  1993-04-05  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 445
“Upon a proper determination that the accused has committed perjury at trial, an enhancement of sentence is required by the Sentencing Guidelines.”
U.S. v. Butler  ·  1993-04-05  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  pin 113 S. Ct. at 1111
"Upon a proper determination that the accused has committed perjury at trial, an enhancement of sentence is required by the Sentencing Guidelines."
Page 1 of 2   Next →