Cases pin-citing Cisneros · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Cisneros

Cases pin-citing Cisneros

Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group  ·  1993  ·  69 pinpoint citations from 20 cases, 15 distinct passages.

Stroud v. THI of South Carolina at Greenville  ·  2024-03-20  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
"[T]he use of such a 'notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the 'notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section."
Cipla Ltd. v. Amgen Inc.  ·  2019-05-02  ·  D. Delaware  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
"[T]he use of such a 'notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the 'notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section."
Regions Bank v. BP P.L.C.  ·  2016-01-29  ·  Supreme Court of Alabama  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding* section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”
United States v. Ghassan Elashi  ·  2015-06-12  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”
Ohio Neighborhood Fin., Inc. v. Scott (Slip Opinion)  ·  2014-06-11  ·  Ohio Supreme Court  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section”
Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. AVELA, INC.  ·  2011-08-19  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
"[T]he use of such a `notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the `notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section"
Warner v. CitiFinancial, Inc. (In Re Warner)  ·  2011-03-03  ·  D. Vermont  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“[a]s we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”
Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A., Inc.  ·  2011-02-23  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section”
Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A., Inc.  ·  2011-02-23  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
"[T]he use of such a `notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the `notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section"
United States v. Lambert  ·  2010-09-20  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“[I]n construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding1 clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding1 section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”
Davon Group Ltd. v. Dyer  ·  2009-07-27  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”
Ocean View Towers Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. United States  ·  2009-07-15  ·  Federal Claims  ·  pin 113 S. Ct. at 1898
“1994 Act”
United States v. Pipkin  ·  2008-02-19  ·  N.D. Iowa  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“[I]n construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”
United States v. Hyde  ·  2007-08-07  ·  First Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“[I]n construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”
Pino v. Hawley  ·  2007-03-26  ·  W.D. Pennsylvania  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”
Orlando Food Corp. v. United States  ·  2005-09-14  ·  Federal Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
"As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a `notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the `notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section."
United States v. Charter Communications, Inc.  ·  2005-01-04  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  5 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override the conflicting provisions of any other section.”
Orelski v. NCS Pearson  ·  2004-09-27  ·  W.D. Pennsylvania  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a “notwithstanding” clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the “notwithstanding” section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”
Campbell v. Minneapolis Public Housing Authority  ·  1999-02-10  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 10
“As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override the conflicting provisions of any other section.”
Page 1 of 2   Next →