Cases pin-citing Wisconsin v. Mitchell · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Wisconsin v. Mitchell

Cases pin-citing Wisconsin v. Mitchell

Wisconsin v. Mitchell  ·  1993  ·  86 pinpoint citations from 29 cases, 16 distinct passages.

United States v. Matthew Mercer-Kinser  ·  2025-08-13  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  pin 508 U.S. at 476
“The First Amendment, moreover, does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent.”
State v. Locke  ·  2021-12-30  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“A physical assault is not * * * expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment”
United States v. William Wolf  ·  2017-05-24  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“The First Amendment ... does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent.”
Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.  ·  2015-06-25  ·  Supreme Court  ·  pin 508 U.S. at 476
“[T]he same criminal con- duct may be more heavily punished if the victim is selected because of his race or other protected status”
Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.  ·  2015-06-25  ·  Supreme Court  ·  4 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
"[T]he same criminal conduct may be more heavily punished if the victim is selected because of his race or other protected status"
United States v. Ahmed  ·  2015-05-15  ·  D. Minnesota  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“The First Amendment, moreover, does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent.”
United States v. Farah  ·  2015-05-15  ·  D. Minnesota  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“The First Amendment, moreover, does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent.”
United States v. Pierce  ·  2015-05-11  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“The First Amendment ... does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent.”
Marshall v. Bristol Superior Court  ·  2014-05-23  ·  First Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“There is no doubt that we are bound by a state court’s construction of a state statute.”
United States v. Fullmer  ·  2009-10-14  ·  Third Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
"The First Amendment ... does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent."
Boim, Stanley v. Holy Land Foundation  ·  2008-12-03  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  pin 508 U.S. at 476
“The First Amendment . . . does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent.”
Boim v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development  ·  2008-12-03  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
"The First Amendment ... does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent."
United States v. Fell  ·  2008-06-27  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“[A] defendant’s abstract beliefs, however obnoxious to most people, may not be taken into consideration by a sentencing judge”
Winzer v. Hall  ·  2007-07-23  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“There is no doubt that we are bound by a state court’s construction of a state statute.”
Koshko v. Haining  ·  2007-01-12  ·  Court of Appeals of Maryland  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
"There is no doubt that we are bound by a state court's construction of a state statute."
United States v. Reiner  ·  2006-11-09  ·  E.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“The First Amendment ... does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent.”
United States v. Leach  ·  2006-11-06  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“Traditionally, sentencing judges have considered a wide variety of factors in addition to evidence bearing on guilt in determining what sentence to impose on a convicted defendant.”
Annelore B. Norton and Lois Greiffendorf v. John Ashcroft  ·  2002-07-31  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 S. Ct. at 476
“[A] physical assault is not by any stretch of the imagination expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment.”
State v. Murphy  ·  2000-09-12  ·  Supreme Court of Connecticut  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“[t]he First Amendment . . . does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent”
In Re CLD  ·  1999-10-28  ·  District of Columbia Court of Appeals  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
"The First Amendment. . . does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent."
United States v. Rahman  ·  1999-08-16  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“A physical assault is not ... expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment”
Rice v. Paladin Enterprises, Inc.  ·  1997-12-04  ·  pin 113 S. Ct. at 2194
“The First Amendment ... does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent.”
Rice v. Paladin Enterprises, Inc.  ·  1997-11-10  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
"The First Amendment ... does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent."
Hoffman v. Hunt  ·  1997-09-19  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“[A] physical assault is not ... expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment.”
Planned Parenthood of Columbia/Williamette, Inc. v. American Coalition of Life Activists  ·  1996-09-18  ·  D. Oregon  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“[a] physical assault is not by any stretch of the imagination expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment”
United States v. Regina Rene Dinwiddie  ·  1996-05-09  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“[A] physical assault is not by any stretch of the imagination expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment.”
American Life League, Inc. v. Reno  ·  1995-02-13  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
“a physical assault is not by any stretch of the imagination expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment”
American Life League, Inc. v. Reno  ·  1995-02-13  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 113 L. Ed. 2d at 436
"a physical assault is not by any stretch of the imagination expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment"
Page 1 of 2   Next →