Dyer v. Air Methods Corporation  ·  2020-12-17  ·  D. South Carolina  ·  pin 513 U.S. at 219

“[T]erms and conditions airlines offer and passengers accept are privately ordered obligations and thus do not amount to a State’s ‘enact[ment] or enforce[ment] [of] any law, rule, regulation, standard, or other provision having the force and effect of law[.]’”

Med. Mut. of Ohio v. Air Evac Ems, Inc.  ·  2018-09-17  ·  N.D. Ohio  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 219

"We do not read the ADA's preemption clause, however, to shelter airlines from suits alleging no violation of state-imposed obligations, but seeking recovery solely for the airline's alleged breach of its own, self-imposed undertakings."

Eugene Debons v. Globus Medical, Inc.  ·  2016-08-16  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 219

“[Contracting parties can enforce the substantive terms of a private agreement even if they exceed the requirements of federal law”

Delaware & Hudson Railway Co. v. Knoedler Manufacturers, Inc.  ·  2015-01-09  ·  Third Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 715

“We do not read the [Airline Deregulation Act]’s preemption clause ... to shelter airlines from suits alleging no violation of state-imposed obligations, but seeking recovery solely for the airline’s alleged breach of its own, self-imposed undertakings.”

Epps v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.  ·  2012-04-05  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 219

“a common-law remedy for a contractual commitment voluntarily undertaken should not be regarded as a requirement imposed under state law[.]”

Wu v. Pearson Education, Inc.  ·  2011-09-30  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 219

“[C]ontract law is not at its core diverse, nonuniform, and confusing.”

Barber Auto Sales, Inc. v. United Parcel Services, Inc.  ·  2007-06-05  ·  N.D. Alabama  ·  pin 115 S. Ct. at 817

“Injunctive relief is extraordinary relieff.]”

Insurance Company of North America, a Corporation Zomaya Group, Inc., a Corporation v. Federal Express Corporation, a Corporation,defendant-Appellee  ·  1999-08-30  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 219

“The ADA’s preemption clause ... read together with the FAA’s saving clause, stops States from imposing their own substantive standards with respect to rates, routes, or services .... ”

Singer v. AT & T Corp.  ·  1998-03-04  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 219

“eontract law is not at its core diverse, nonuniform and confusing”