Cases pin-citing Kyles · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Kyles

Cases pin-citing Kyles

Kyles v. Whitley  ·  1995  ·  207 pinpoint citations from 81 cases, 54 distinct passages.

Charles Martin v. Jeffrey Nines  ·  2025-01-16  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  pin 514 U.S. at 419
“This rule is clear.”
Jimenez v. Graham  ·  2022-07-15  ·  S.D. New York  ·  pin 514 U.S. at 419
“[T]he prosecution, which alone can know what is undisclosed, must be assigned the . . . responsibility to gauge the net effect of all such evidence and make disclosure when the point of ‘reasonable probability’ is reached.”
State v. Alexander  ·  2022-03-11  ·  Supreme Court of North Carolina  ·  pin 514 U.S. at 419
“[M]ateriality . . . is not a sufficiency of evidence test. A defendant need not demonstrate that after discounting the inculpatory evidence in light of the undisclosed evidence, there would not have been enough left to convict.”
State v. Alexander  ·  2022-03-11  ·  Supreme Court of North Carolina  ·  pin 514 U.S. at 419
“[M]ateriality . . . is not a sufficiency of evidence test. A defendant need not demonstrate that after discounting the inculpatory evidence in light of the undisclosed evidence, there would not have been enough left to convict.”
Whitson v. United States  ·  2021-11-30  ·  M.D. Tennessee  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“The question is not whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different verdict with the evidence, but whether in its absence he received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.”
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LAWRENCE EUGENE ALLEN  ·  2020-12-10  ·  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee  ·  pin 514 U.S. at 419
“This rule is clear, and none of the Brady cases has ever suggested that sufficiency of evidence (or insufficiency) is the touchstone [of materiality]”
Lavar R. Jernigan v. State of Tennessee  ·  2020-08-14  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“This rule is clear, and none of the Brady cases has ever suggested that sufficiency of evidence (or insufficiency) is the touchstone [of materiality].”
Ralph Carusone v. Warden  ·  2020-07-17  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  pin 514 U.S. at 419
“a showing of materiality does not require demonstration by a preponderance that disclosure of the suppressed evidence would have resulted ultimately in the defendant’s acquittal”
Ralph Carusone v. Warden  ·  2020-07-17  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  pin 514 U.S. at 419
“a showing of materiality does not require demonstration by a preponderance that disclosure of the suppressed evidence would have resulted ultimately in the defendant’s acquittal”
Pham v. Shinn  ·  2020-03-02  ·  D. Arizona  ·  pin 514 U.S. at 419
“The prosecution’s affirmative duty to disclose evidence favorable to a 12 defendant can trace its origins to . . . this Court’s decision1 . . . [where] it became clear that 13 a defendant’s failure to request favorable evidence did not leave the Government free of 14 all obligation.”
Kelley v. Burton  ·  2019-05-01  ·  E.D. Michigan  ·  pin 131 L. Ed. 2d at 490
" Brady ...applies to relevant evidence in the hands of the police, whether the prosecutors knew about it or not, whether they suppressed it intentionally or not... and whether the accused asked for it or not."
McGowan v. Christiansen  ·  2018-12-18  ·  E.D. Michigan  ·  pin 131 L. Ed. 2d at 490
" Brady ... applies to relevant evidence in the hands of the police, whether the prosecutors knew about it or not, whether they suppressed it intentionally or not ... and whether the accused asked for it or not."
Com. v. Craig, R.  ·  2018-11-30  ·  Superior Court of Pennsylvania  ·  pin 115 S. Ct. at 1555
"[T]he Constitution is not violated every time the government fails or chooses not to disclose evidence that might prove helpful to the defense .... We have never held that the Constitution demands an open file policy .... "
George Alvarez v. City of Brownsville  ·  2018-09-18  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
"[T]he individual prosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to the others acting on the government's behalf in the case, including the police."
Birano v. State.  ·  2018-08-31  ·  Hawaii Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
"[O]nce a reviewing court ... has found constitutional error [from nondisclosure], there is no need for further harmless-error review."
United States v. Govey  ·  2018-03-01  ·  C.D. California  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
"[T]he individual prosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to the others acting on the government's behalf in the case, including the police."
Commonwealth v. Barsell  ·  2017-11-16  ·  Massachusetts Appeals Court  ·  pin 514 U.S. at 419
"[T]he individual prosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to the others acting on the government's behalf in the case, including the police"
Anthony Juniper v. David Zook  ·  2017-11-16  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  pin 115 S. Ct. at 1555
“Suppressed evidence that would be cumulative of other evidence ... is generally not considered material ‘for Brady purposes.”
Commonwealth v. Maldonodo  ·  2017-09-12  ·  Superior Court of Pennsylvania  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“[A] prosecutor anxious about tacking too close to the wind will disclose a favorable piece of evidence. This is as it should be.”
United States v. Samuel Cohen  ·  2017-03-29  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“There was sufficient evidence to convict Davis, without Duran’s testimony.”
United States v. Sergeant ERIC D. SHORTS  ·  2017-01-24  ·  Army Court of Criminal Appeals  ·  pin 115 S. Ct. at 1555
“The individual prosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to others acting on the Government’s behalf.”
United States v. Desage  ·  2017-01-09  ·  D. Nevada  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 S. Ct. at 419
“the individual prosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to others acting on the government’s behalf in [the particular case], including police.”
State v. Lacaze  ·  2016-12-16  ·  Supreme Court of Louisiana  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“The question is ... whether in its absence he received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.”
State of Florida v. Jacob John Dougan, Jr.  ·  2016-10-20  ·  Supreme Court of Florida  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“The likely damage [of a witness’s suppressed statements] is best understood by taking the word of the prosecutor.”
State v. Serigne  ·  2016-05-02  ·  Louisiana Court of Appeal  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“[T]he individual prosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to the others acting on the government’s behalf in the case, including the police.”
State v. Wells  ·  2016-04-13  ·  Louisiana Court of Appeal  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 131 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“[T]he individual prosecutor has á duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to the others acting on the government’s behalf in the case, including the police.”
United States v. Straker  ·  2015-09-01  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“[T]he state’s disclosure obligation turns on the cumulative effect of all suppressed evidence favorable to the defense, not on the evidence considered item by item.”
Hoyt Crace v. Robert Herzog  ·  2015-08-14  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“The question is not whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different verdict with the evidence, but whether in its absence he received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.”
United States v. Espinal  ·  2015-03-10  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“[A] prosecutor anxious about tacking too close to the wind will disclose a favorable piece of evidence.”
United States v. Abel Tavera  ·  2013-06-20  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“The question is not whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different verdict with the evidence, but whether in its absence he received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.”
United States v. Cortez Fisher  ·  2013-04-01  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“[P]rosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to the others acting on the government’s behalf in the case, including the police.”
State v. Widmer  ·  2013-01-14  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 S. Ct. at 419
"the individual prosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to others acting on the government's behalf in the case, including the police"
State ex rel. Koster v. Green  ·  2012-12-26  ·  Missouri Court of Appeals  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 131 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“Claim No. 1”
Anthony John Ponticelli v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections  ·  2012-08-16  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 S. Ct. at 419
“We evaluate the tendency and force of the undisclosed evidence item by item; there is no other way. We evaluate its cumulative effect . . . separately.”
Anthony John Ponticelli v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections  ·  2012-08-16  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  5 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“We evaluate the tendency and force of the undisclosed evidence item by item; there is no other way. We evaluate its cumulative effect . . . separately.”
Commonwealth v. Williams  ·  2012-02-22  ·  Fairfax County Circuit Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 S. Ct. at 419
“the prosecution, which alone can know what is undisclosed, must be assigned the consequent responsibility to gauge the likely net effect of all such evidence and make disclosure when the point of reasonable probability is reached”
Montgomery v. Bobby  ·  2011-08-22  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  pin 115 S. Ct. at 1555
"The question is not whether [a] defendant would more likely than not have received a different verdict with the evidence"
Roth Ex Rel. Bower v. United States Department of Justice  ·  2011-06-28  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
"[T]he individual prosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to the others acting on the government's behalf in the case, including the police."
United States v. Robinson  ·  2010-12-01  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“[T]he individual prosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to the others acting on the government’s behalf in the case, including the police.”
Bridgeman v. State  ·  2010-11-02  ·  Court of Appeals of Mississippi  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“[T]he individual prosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to the others acting on the government’s behalf in the case, including the police.”
Manning v. Epps  ·  2010-03-02  ·  N.D. Mississippi  ·  pin 115 S. Ct. at 1555
“[T]he Constitution is not violated every time the government fails or chooses not to disclose evidence that might prove helpful to the defense.”
Matthews v. Workman  ·  2009-07-07  ·  Tenth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
"[A] reasonable probability that ... the result of the proceeding would have been different necessarily entails the conclusion that [suppression of evidence] had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict."
United States v. Mauskar  ·  2009-01-30  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“[S]howing that the prosecution knew of an item of favorable evidence unknown to the defense does not amount to a Brady violation, without more.”
United States v. Douglas  ·  2008-05-13  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“the constitutional duty is triggered by the potential impact of favorable but undisclosed evidence”
Call v. Polk  ·  2006-09-22  ·  W.D. North Carolina  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“The question is not whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different verdict with the evidence, but whether in its absence he received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.”
United States v. Mejia, Rafael  ·  2006-06-02  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“[T]he Constitution is not violated every time the government fails or chooses not to disclose evidence that might prove helpful to the defense.”
Roy Lee Pippin v. Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division  ·  2005-12-28  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“[T]he prosecution, which alone can know what is undisclosed, must be assigned the consequent responsibility to gauge the likely new effect of all such evidence and make disclosure when the point of ‘reasonable probability’ is reached.”
Healy v. Spencer  ·  2005-11-08  ·  D. Massachusetts  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
“The question is not whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different verdict with the evidence, but whether in its absence he received a fair *311 trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.”
Guy Zappulla v. People of the State of New York  ·  2004-12-07  ·  Second Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 419
"This is not the `massive' case envisioned by the dissent ... it is a significantly weaker case than the one heard by the first jury, which could not even reach a verdict."
United States v. Rodriguez-Marrero  ·  2004-11-05  ·  First Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 490
“The question [as defined by Bagley ] is not whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different-verdict with the evidence, but whether in its absence he received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.”
Page 1 of 5   Next →