Cases pin-citing Bartnicki · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Bartnicki

Cases pin-citing Bartnicki

Bartnicki v. Vopper  ·  2001  ·  49 pinpoint citations from 19 cases, 15 distinct passages.

PETA v. Josh Stein  ·  2023-02-23  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  pin 532 U.S. at 514
“[T]he prohibition against the ‘use’ of the contents of an illegal interception . . . is . . . a regulation of conduct,” unlike a “naked prohibition against disclosures” which “is fairly characterized as a regulation of pure speech.”
PETA v. Josh Stein  ·  2023-02-23  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  pin 532 U.S. at 514
“[T]he prohibition against the ‘use’ of the contents of an illegal interception . . . is . . . a regulation of conduct,” unlike a “naked prohibition against disclosures” which “is fairly characterized as a regulation of pure speech.”
PETA v. NC Farm Bureau  ·  2023-02-23  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  pin 532 U.S. at 514
“[T]he prohibition against the ‘use’ of the contents of an illegal interception . . . is . . . a regulation of conduct,” unlike a “naked prohibition against disclosures” which “is fairly characterized as a regulation of pure speech.”
Straw v. Dentons US LLP  ·  2020-06-11  ·  S.D. New York  ·  pin 532 U.S. at 514
“Where a publisher obtains truthful information about a matter of public significance then state officials may not constitutionally punish publication of the information, absent a need . . . of the highest order.”
Martin v. Gross  ·  2018-12-10  ·  District of Columbia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
"Privacy of communication is an important interest ...."
Chamber of Commerce for Greater Phila. v. City of Phila.  ·  2018-04-30  ·  E.D. Pennsylvania  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
"[I]f the acts of 'disclosing' and 'publishing' information do not constitute speech, it is hard to imagine what does fall within that category, as distinct from the category of expressive conduct"
Fox v. Hamptons at Metrowest Condominium Ass'n  ·  2017-07-21  ·  District Court of Appeal of Florida  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
“[Privacy concerns give way when balanced against the interest in publishing matters of public importance.”
Palm Beach Newspapers, LLC v. State  ·  2016-01-21  ·  District Court of Appeal of Florida  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
“[P]rivacy concerns give way when balanced against the interest in publishing matters of public importance.”
Scott Dahlstrom v. Sun-Times Media, LLC  ·  2015-02-06  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  pin 121 S. Ct. at 1753
“The normal method of deterring unlawful conduct is to impose an appropriate punishment on the person who engages in it.”
Gawker Media, LLC v. Bollea  ·  2014-01-17  ·  District Court of Appeal of Florida  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
“[Privacy concerns give way when balanced against the interest in publishing matters of public importance.... One of the costs associated with participation in public affairs is an attendant loss of privacy.”
Iowa Right To Life Committee v. Megan Tooker  ·  2013-06-13  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
“[T]he communications at issue are singled out ... by virtue of the source, rather than the subject matter.”
Backpage.Com, LLC v. Cooper  ·  2013-01-03  ·  M.D. Tennessee  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
“The normal method of deterring unlawful conduct is to impose an appropriate punishment on the person who engages in it.”
American Civil Liberties Union of Ill. v. Alvarez  ·  2012-05-08  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
"Privacy of communication is an important interest...."
Jerry Beeman & Pharmacy Services, Inc. v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC  ·  2011-07-19  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
“[S]tate action to punish the publication of truthful information seldom can satisfy constitutional standards.”
Beeman v. ANTHEM PRESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT, LLC  ·  2011-07-19  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
"[S]tate action to punish the publication of truthful information seldom can satisfy constitutional standards."
Johnson v. Raemisch  ·  2008-05-23  ·  W.D. Wisconsin  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 787
“It was the overriding importance of that commitment [to public debate] that supported our holding that neither factual error nor defamatory content, nor a combination of the two, sufficed to remove the First Amendment shield from criticism of official conduct.”
Boehner v. McDermott  ·  2008-03-31  ·  District of Columbia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
“Amicus Amount”
Rios v. Direct Mail Express, Inc.  ·  2006-05-23  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
“[w]e think it clear that parallel reasoning requires the conclusion that a stranger’s illegal conduct does not suffice to remove the First Amendment shield from speech about a matter of public concern.”
American Library Ass'n, Inc. v. United States  ·  2002-05-31  ·  E.D. Pennsylvania  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 514
“The normal method of deterring unlawful conduct is to impose an appropriate punishment on the person who engages in it.”