Cases pin-citing Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr

Cases pin-citing Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr  ·  2001  ·  271 pinpoint citations from 97 cases, 66 distinct passages.

Ellen M Andary v. Usaa Casualty Insurance Company  ·  2022-08-25  ·  Michigan Court of Appeals  ·  pin 150 L. Ed. 2d at 347
“[T]he judgment whether a particular statute acts retroactively should be informed and guided by familiar considerations of fair notice, reasonable reliance, and settled expectations.”
Braun v. United States of America  ·  2021-03-08  ·  District of Columbia  ·  pin 533 U.S. at 289
“The standard for finding such unambiguous direction is a demanding one[,] . . . [requiring] ‘statutory language that was so clear that it could sustain only one interpretation.’”
Melida Luna-Garcia v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen  ·  2019-07-23  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"[T]he term 'removal' was substituted for 'deportation.' "
Melida Luna-Garcia v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen  ·  2019-05-15  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"[T]he term `removal' was substituted for `deportation.'"
Usama Hamama v. Rebecca Adducci  ·  2018-12-20  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"At its historical core," the writ "served as a means of reviewing the legality of Executive detention."
Wendy Osorio Martinez v. Attorney General United States  ·  2018-06-18  ·  Third Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"At its historical core, the writ of habeas corpus has served as a means of reviewing the legality of Executive detention, and it is in that context that its protections have been strongest."
United States v. Gonzales  ·  2018-03-13  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"There can be little doubt that, as a general matter, alien defendants considering whether to enter into a plea agreement are acutely aware of the immigration consequences of their convictions."
Intl. Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump  ·  2018-02-15  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"[W]e are obligated to construe the statute to avoid [serious constitutional] problems."
Devitri v. Cronen  ·  2018-02-01  ·  D. Massachusetts  ·  pin 533 U.S. at 289
“Congress could, without raising any constitutional questions, provide an adequate substitute through the courts of appeals.”
Devitri v. Cronen  ·  2018-02-01  ·  District of Columbia  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"Congress could, without raising any constitutional questions, provide an adequate substitute through the courts of appeals."
Devitri v. Cronen  ·  2017-11-27  ·  District of Columbia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"Congress could, without raising any constitutional questions, provide an adequate substitute through the courts of appeals."
Jose Ruiz-Vidal v. Loretta E. Lynch  ·  2015-10-09  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“[A]lien defendants considering whether to enter into a plea agreement are acutely aware of the immigration consequences of their convictions”
Jose Ruiz-Vidal v. Loretta E. Lynch  ·  2015-06-17  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“[A]lien defendants considering whether to enter into a plea agreement are acutely aware of the immigration consequences of their convictions.”
M.S.P.C. v. U.S. Customs & Border Protection  ·  2014-10-16  ·  D. New Mexico  ·  pin 121 S. Ct. at 2271
“Our case law does not contain extensive discussion of standards defining suspension of the writ or of circumstances under which suspension has occurred.”
Ariana Klay v. Leon Panetta  ·  2014-07-18  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“[I]t is beyond dispute that, within constitutional limits, Congress has the power to enact laws with retrospective effect.”
Centurion v. Holder  ·  2014-06-17  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“St. Cyr II”
Centurion v. Holder  ·  2014-06-17  ·  Second Circuit  ·  pin 533 U.S. at 289
“St. Cyr I”
Ex Parte Martin Guadalupe Campos Leal  ·  2014-02-12  ·  Court of Appeals of Texas  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“Preserving the client’s right to remain in the United States may be more important to the client than any potential jail sentence.”
Fadi Maqaleh v. Chuck Hagel  ·  2013-12-24  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“At its historical core, the writ of habeas corpus has served as a means of reviewing the legality of Executive detention.... ”
Elias Jimenez-Galicia v. U.S. Attorney General  ·  2012-08-13  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  pin 533 U.S. at 289
“Eligibility that was governed by specific statutory standards provided a right to a ruling on an applicant’s eligibility, even though the actual granting of relief was not a matter of right under any circumstances, but rather is in all cases a matter of grace.”
Fair Housing Council v. Roommate. Com, LLC  ·  2012-02-02  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"[I]f an otherwise acceptable construction of a statute would raise serious constitutional problems, and where an alternative interpretation of the statute is fairly possible, we are obligated to construe the statute to avoid such problems."
Sandra Omar v. John M. McHugh  ·  2011-06-21  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“Implications from statutory text or legislative history are not sufficient to repeal habeas jurisdiction; instead, Congress must articulate [a] specific and unambiguous statutory directive[] to effect a repeal”
Saunders v. District of Columbia  ·  2011-06-06  ·  District of Columbia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“[T]he mere promulgation of an effective date for a statute does not provide sufficient assurance that Congress specifically considered the potential unfairness that retroactive application would produce.”
Empresa Cubana Exportadora De Alimentos Y Productos Varios v. United States Department of Treasury  ·  2011-03-29  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"A statute has retroactive effect when it takes away or impairs vested rights acquired under existing laws...."
State v. Sandoval  ·  2011-03-17  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“There can be little doubt that, as a general matter, alien defendants considering whether to enter into a plea agreement are acutely aware of the immigration consequences of their convictions.”
State v. Sandoval  ·  2011-03-17  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"There can be little doubt that, as a general matter, alien defendants considering whether to enter into a plea agreement are acutely aware of the immigration consequences of their convictions."
Vartelas v. Holder  ·  2010-09-09  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“St. Cyr II”
Ileto v. Glock, Inc.  ·  2009-05-11  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"[I]f an otherwise acceptable construction of a statute would raise serious constitutional problems, and where an alternative interpretation of the statute is `fairly possible,' we are obligated to construe the statute to avoid such problems."
Al Maqaleh v. Gates  ·  2009-04-02  ·  District of Columbia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“At its historical core, the writ of habeas corpus has served as a means of reviewing the legality of Executive detention, and it is in that context that its protections have been strongest.”
Samuels v. Chertoff  ·  2008-12-19  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“[T]he mere promulgation of an effective date for a statute does not provide sufficient assurance that Congress specifically considered the potential unfairness that retroactive application would produce.”
Nicholson v. United States  ·  2008-07-18  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“Plea agreements involve a quid pro quo between a criminal defendant and the government.”
Hamdan v. Gates  ·  2008-07-18  ·  District of Columbia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“At its historical core, the writ of habeas corpus has served as a means of reviewing the legality of executive detention, and it is in that context that its protections have been strongest.”
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Bureau of Land Management  ·  2008-06-27  ·  District of Columbia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“The inquiry into whether a statute operates retroactively demands a commonsense, functional judgment....”
Buono v. Kempthorne  ·  2008-05-14  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  pin 533 U.S. at 289
“[T]he elementary rule is that every reasonable con- struction must be resorted to, in order to save a statute from unconstitutionality.”
Buono v. Kempthorne  ·  2008-05-14  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"[T]he elementary rule is that every reasonable construction must be resorted to, in order to save a statute from unconstitutionality."
United States v. De Horta Garcia, Jos  ·  2008-03-13  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  pin 533 U.S. at 289
“Traditionally, courts recognized a distinction between eligibility for discretionary relief, on the one hand, and the favorable exercise of discretion, on the other hand.”
United States v. De Horta Garcia  ·  2008-03-13  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
"Traditionally, courts recognized a distinction between eligibility for discretionary relief, on the one hand, and the favorable exercise of discretion, on the other hand."
Ruiz-Martinez v. Mukasey  ·  2008-02-14  ·  Second Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“A construction of [the INA] that would entirely preclude review of a pure question of law by any court would give rise to substantial constitutional questions.”
Jean-Pierre v. U.S. Attorney General  ·  2007-09-19  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“[T]he issuance of the writ [of habeas corpus] was not limited to challenges to the jurisdiction of the custodian, but encompassed detentions based on errors of law, including the erroneous application or interpretation of statutes.”
Camins v. Gonzales  ·  2007-08-28  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“[T]he first step in determining whether a statute has an impermissible retroactive effect is to ascertain whether Congress has directed with the requisite clarity that the law be applied retrospectively.”
Campbell v. Chadbourne  ·  2007-07-19  ·  D. Massachusetts  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“Implications from statutory text or legislative history are not sufficient to repeal habeas jurisdiction; instead, Congress must articulate specific and unambiguous statutory directives to effect a repeal”
United States v. Kapp  ·  2007-05-16  ·  M.D. Pennsylvania  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“A statute may not be applied *541 retroactively ... absent a clear indication from Congress that it intended such a result.”
Doe v. Schwarzenegger  ·  2007-02-09  ·  E.D. California  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 347
“[I]f an otherwise acceptable construction of a statute would raise serious constitutional problems, and where an alternative interpretation of the statute is ‘fairly possible,’ ... we are obligated to construe the statute to avoid such problems.”
Abdi Gelle Mohamed v. Alberto Gonzales  ·  2007-02-02  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  pin 533 U.S. at 289
"As to the question of timing and congruent means of review, we note that Congress could, without raising any constitutional questions, provide an adequate substitute [to replace habeas proceedings for aliens resisting a removal order] through the courts of appeals."
Abdi Gelle Mohamed v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General  ·  2007-02-02  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 347
“As to the question of timing and congruent means of review, we note that Congress could, without raising any constitutional questions, provide an adequate substitute [to replace habeas proceedings for aliens resisting a removal order] through the courts of appeals.”
Becker v. Gonzales  ·  2007-01-10  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“IIRIRA’s amendment of the definition of ‘aggravated fel- ony’ . . . clearly states that it applies with respect to ‘convic- tion[s] . . . entered before, on, or after’ the statute’s enactment date.”
Michael Herbert Becker v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General  ·  2007-01-10  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“IIRIRA’s amendment of the definition of ‘aggravated felony’ ... clearly states that it applies with respect to ‘conviction[s] ... entered before, on, or after’ the statute’s enactment date.”
Heaven v. Gonzales  ·  2006-12-14  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 289
“[I]t is beyond dispute that, within constitutional limits, Congress has the power to enact laws with retrospective effect.”
Abdi Gelle Mohamed v. Alberto Gonzales  ·  2006-11-27  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  pin 533 U.S. at 289
"As to the question of timing and congruent means of review, we note that Congress could, without raising any constitutional questions, provide an adequate substitute [to replace habeas proceedings for aliens resisting a removal order] through the courts of appeals."
Abdi Gelle Mohamed v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General  ·  2006-11-27  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 121 L. Ed. 2d at 347
“As to the question of timing and congruent means of review, we note that Congress could, without raising any constitutional questions, provide an adequate substitute [to replace habeas proceedings for aliens resisting a removal order] through the courts of appeals.”
Page 1 of 6   Next →