Cases pin-citing Rowell
State v. Rowell · 1995 · 10 pinpoint citations from 10 cases, 4 distinct passages.
State v. Ochoa
· 2008-04-08 · New Mexico Supreme Court · pin 121 N.M. at 111
“We review questions of law de novo.”
State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Brandy S.
· 2007-08-24 · New Mexico Court of Appeals · pin 121 N.M. at 111
“We review questions of law de novo.”
State ex rel. Richardson v. Fifth Judicial District Nominating Commission
· 2007-05-18 · New Mexico Supreme Court · pin 121 N.M. at 111
“ ‘[0]ur construction must not render the [Constitution’s] application absurd, unreasonable, or unjust.’ ”
State v. Katrina G.
· 2007-03-05 · New Mexico Court of Appeals · pin 121 N.M. at 111
“We review questions of law de novo.”
Garcia v. Dorsey
· 2006-11-22 · New Mexico Supreme Court · pin 121 N.M. at 111
“We review questions of law de novo.”
State v. Jade G.
· 2004-11-09 · New Mexico Court of Appeals · pin 121 N.M. at 111
“Interpretation of a statute is an issue of law, not a question of fact.”
State v. Young
· 2004-04-21 · New Mexico Supreme Court · pin 121 N.M. at 111
“Interpretation of a statute is an issue of law ....”
State v. Frost
· 2002-11-14 · New Mexico Court of Appeals · pin 121 N.M. at 111
“Interpretation of a statute is an issue of law, not a question of fact.”
County of Bernalillo v. New Mexico Public Regulation Commission
· 2000-11-15 · New Mexico Supreme Court · pin 121 N.M. at 111
“Interpretation of a statute is an issue of law, not a question of fact.”
In Re Adjustments to Franchise Fees
· 2000-11-15 · New Mexico Supreme Court · pin 121 N.M. at 111
"Interpretation of a statute is an issue of law, not a question of fact."