Cases pin-citing Love
Love v. Commonwealth · 1994 · 8 pinpoint citations from 6 cases, 3 distinct passages.
Chad William Edward Robeson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
· 2008-05-27 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · pin 18 Va. App. at 84
“[I]nsertion of the defendant’s tongue into the victim’s vagina need not be shown to prove cunnilingus.”
Jackie Dale Slate v. Commonwealth
· 2008-03-11 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · pin 18 Va. App. at 84
“[I]nsertion of the defendant’s tongue into the victim’s vagina need not be shown to prove cunnilingus.”
State v. P.H.
· 2002-08-02 · New Jersey Superior Court App Division · pin 18 Va. App. at 84
“[I]t was up to the jury to determine what effect, if any, the delay in [the child] reporting the [alleged sexual abuse] had on the credibility of the child’s testimony.”
State v. PH
· 2002-08-02 · New Jersey Superior Court App Division · pin 18 Va. App. at 84
"[I]t was up to the jury to determine what effect, if any, the delay in [the child] reporting the [alleged sexual abuse] had on the credibility of the child's testimony."
Jett v. Commonwealth
· 1999-02-23 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2 pin-cites
· pin 18 Va. App. at 84
"the legislature intended to mandate the same degree of penetration for all of these offenses"
Jett v. Commonwealth
· 1998-07-14 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2 pin-cites
· pin 18 Va. App. at 84
"the legislature intended to mandate the same degree of penetration for all of these offenses"