Cases pin-citing Sugg · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Sugg

Cases pin-citing Sugg

State v. Sugg  ·  1995  ·  16 pinpoint citations from 10 cases, 6 distinct passages.

State of West Virginia v. M.W.  ·  2024-10-29  ·  West Virginia Supreme Court  ·  pin 456 S.E.2d at 469
“The absence of a parent or counsel when a juvenile waives his rights is not necessarily a bar to a voluntary Miranda waiver and ultimately a confession.”
State of West Virginia v. Matthew S. Dixon  ·  2023-09-15  ·  West Virginia Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 193 S.E.2d at 388
“A judgment of conviction will not be set aside because of improper remarks made by a prosecuting attorney to a jury which do not clearly prejudice the accused or result in manifest injustice.”
State of West Virginia v. Jimmy Dean Mullins  ·  2018-06-11  ·  West Virginia Supreme Court  ·  pin 193 W. Va. at 388
“As a general proposition, we will not disturb a sentence following a criminal conviction if it falls within the range of what is permitted under the statute.”
State of West Virginia v. Jedediah C.  ·  2018-03-14  ·  West Virginia Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 193 S.E.2d at 388
"As a general proposition, we will not disturb a sentence following a criminal conviction if it falls within the range of what is permitted under the statute."
State of West Virginia v. Chaz A. Simmons  ·  2017-06-16  ·  West Virginia Supreme Court  ·  pin 193 W. Va. at 388
“[f]ailure to make this motion [to suppress] will under most circumstances constitute waiver under Rule 12(f) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure.”
State of West Virginia v. David Wilson  ·  2015-09-21  ·  West Virginia Supreme Court  ·  pin 193 W. Va. at 388
“we will not disturb a sentence following a criminal conviction if it falls within the range of what is permitted under the statute.”
State of West Virginia v. Christopher Keith Ferrell  ·  2015-06-22  ·  West Virginia Supreme Court  ·  pin 193 W. Va. at 388
“We will not disturb a sentence following a criminal conviction if it falls within the range of what is permitted under the statute.”
State of West Virginia v. William R. Johnson  ·  2013-10-25  ·  West Virginia Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 193 S.E.2d at 388
“A judgment of conviction will not be set aside because of improper remarks made by a prosecuting attorney to a jury which do not clearly prejudice the accused or result in manifest injustice.”
State v. KIRK N.  ·  2003-12-04  ·  West Virginia Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 193 W. Va. at 388
"Thus, when a constitutional right is at stake, its waiver must be knowing, intelligent, and voluntary."
State v. Allen  ·  2000-01-06  ·  West Virginia Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 193 W. Va. at 388
"As a general proposition, we will not disturb a sentence following a criminal conviction if it falls within the range of what is permitted under the statute."