Cases pin-citing Hoffman · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Hoffman

Cases pin-citing Hoffman

State v. Hoffman  ·  1991  ·  35 pinpoint citations from 18 cases, 12 distinct passages.

State Of Washington, V. Jason Michael Jensen  ·  2024-04-22  ·  Court of Appeals of Washington  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
“A trial court is not required to give an instruction which is erroneous in any respect”
State Of Washington, V. John A. Royball  ·  2021-11-02  ·  Court of Appeals of Washington  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
“Proof that a defendant fired a weapon at a victim is, of course, sufficient to justify a finding of intent to kill.”
State v. Dreewes  ·  2019-01-10  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
"the accomplice liability statute predicates criminal liability on general knowledge of the crime and not on specific knowledge of the elements of the participant's crime"
United States v. Jose Valdivia-Flores  ·  2017-12-07  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  pin 116 Wash. 2d at 51
“[I]t is not necessary that jurors be unanimous as to the manner of an accomplice’s - and a principal’s participation as long as all agree that they did participate in the .crime.”
State Of Washington v. Eugene Andrew Young & Claude Hutchinson  ·  2016-03-01  ·  Court of Appeals of Washington  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
“The defendants cannot have it both ways; having decided to follow one course at the trial, they cannot on appeal now change their course and complain that their gamble did not pay off.”
State v. Grier  ·  2011-02-10  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
“The defendants cannot have it both ways; having decided to follow one course at trial, they cannot on appeal now change their course and complain that their gamble did not pay off.”
State v. Grier  ·  2011-02-10  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
"The defendants cannot have it both ways; having decided to follow one course at trial, they cannot on appeal now change their course and complain that their gamble did not pay off."
State v. Lord  ·  2007-08-30  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
“Reversal is not required if the error could have been obviated by a curative instruction which the defense did not request.”
State v. Lord  ·  2007-08-30  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
"Reversal is not required if the error could have been obviated by a curative instruction which the defense did not request."
State v. Elmi  ·  2007-04-23  ·  Court of Appeals of Washington  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
“Proof that a defendant fired a weapon at a victim is, of course, sufficient to justify a finding of intent to kill.”
State v. Elmi  ·  2007-04-23  ·  Court of Appeals of Washington  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
"Proof that a defendant fired a weapon at a victim is, of course, sufficient to justify a finding of intent to kill."
Martini v. State  ·  2004-04-14  ·  Court of Appeals of Washington  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
“The burden is on a moving party to come forward with sufficient facts to warrant the exercise of discretion in his or her favor.”
Martini Ex Rel. Dussault v. State  ·  2004-04-14  ·  Court of Appeals of Washington  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
"The burden is on a moving party to come forward with sufficient facts to warrant the exercise of discretion in his or her favor."
State v. Roberts  ·  2001-02-02  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
"Other decisions have ... similarly concluded that the accomplice liability statute predicates criminal liability on general knowledge of the crime and not on specific knowledge of the elements of the participant's crime."
Ellwein v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co.  ·  2001-01-18  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
"Arguments not supported by relevant citation of authority need not be considered by this court."
Ellwein v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.  ·  2001-01-11  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
“Arguments not supported by relevant citation of authority need not be considered by this court.”
State v. Roberts  ·  2000-12-14  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
“Other decisions have . . . similarly concluded that the accomplice liability statute predicates criminal liability on general knowledge of the crime and not on specific knowledge of the elements of the participant’s crime.”
State v. Jackson  ·  1997-09-08  ·  Court of Appeals of Washington  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 116 P.2d at 51
"`it matters not that some jurors may have believed that the petitioner fired the gun, while others may have believed that his only role was in aiding and abetting [the other participant], so long as all twelve agreed that he did participate'"