State v. Ramirez  ·  2025-08-20  ·  Court of Appeals of Oregon  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 321 Or. at 285

“When proffered scientific evidence raises issues of scientific validity, those issues should be addressed by the trial court in a separate OEC 104(1) hearing, preferably in advance of trial.”

State v. Ramirez  ·  2025-08-20  ·  Court of Appeals of Oregon  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 321 Or. at 285

“When proffered scientific evidence raises issues of scientific validity, those issues should be addressed by the trial court in a separate OEC 104(1) hearing, preferably in advance of trial.”

State v. Meighan  ·  2023-02-08  ·  Court of Appeals of Oregon  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 321 Or. at 285

“Evidence perceived by lay jurors to be scientific in nature possesses an unusually high degree of persuasive power.”

State v. McCrary  ·  2014-10-22  ·  Court of Appeals of Oregon  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 321 Or. at 285

“relationship between the effects of alcohol on the central nervous system, the nystagmus phenomenon, and the HGN test is not within the realm of common knowledge of the average person”