Cases pin-citing Ex Parte Morris · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Ex Parte Morris

Cases pin-citing Ex Parte Morris

Ex Parte Morris  ·  2006  ·  15 pinpoint citations from 13 cases, 11 distinct passages.

SCDSS v. Leeanne Cattles  ·  2021-12-03  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  pin 367 S.C. at 56
"[T]he appellate court's broad scope of review does not relieve the appellant of the burden of showing that the family court committed error."
Taylor v. Taylor  ·  2021-07-07  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  pin 367 S.C. at 56
"[T]he family court may not base necessary findings of fact . . . solely on counsel's statements of fact or arguments."
SCDSS v. Spears  ·  2020-01-13  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  pin 367 S.C. at 56
"[An] unappealed ruling is the law of the case and requires affirmance."
Bauckman v. McLeod  ·  2019-12-11  ·  pin 624 S.E.2d at 649
"Beneficial result alone is not dispositive of whether a party is entitled to attorney's fees."
SCDSS v. McCollin  ·  2018-07-23  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  pin 367 S.C. at 56
"This unappealed ruling is the law of the case and requires affirmance."
SCDSS v. Baker  ·  2018-04-09  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  pin 367 S.C. at 56
"This unappealed ruling is the law of the case and requires affirmance."
State v. Perry  ·  2017-07-26  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 367 S.C. at 56
"It is well established that counsel's statements regarding the facts of a case and counsel's arguments are not admissible evidence."
Simmons v. Simmons  ·  2015-11-18  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  pin 367 S.C. at 56
"[T]he appellate court's broad scope of review does not relieve the appellant of the burden of showing that the family court committed error."
SCDSS v. Sherecca D.  ·  2012-12-12  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 367 S.C. at 56
"In appeals from the family court, the appellate court has the authority to find the facts in accordance with its view of the preponderance of the evidence."
SCDSS v. Jacqueline C.  ·  2011-10-03  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  pin 367 S.C. at 56
"This broad scope of review does not, however, require the appellate court to disregard the findings of the family court. This degree of deference is especially true in cases involving the welfare and best interests of a minor child."
SCDSS v. Julie M.  ·  2011-08-04  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  pin 367 S.C. at 56
"In appeals from the family court, the appellate court has the authority to find the facts in accordance with its view of the preponderance of the evidence."
MIA Funding, LLC v. Sizer  ·  2010-10-14  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  pin 367 S.C. at 56
"As a general rule, to have standing, a litigant must have a personal stake in the subject matter of the litigation."
Brown v. Brown  ·  2009-07-06  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  pin 367 S.C. at 56
"In appeals from the family court, the appellate court has the authority to find the facts in accordance with its own view of the preponderance of the evidence."