Cases pin-citing Pfeiffer

Pfeiffer v. Georgia Department of Transportation · 2002 · 27 pinpoint citations from 26 cases, 18 distinct passages.

SWAP MEAT FILMS, INC. v. REEL SECURITY CORPORATION OF GEORGIA · 2025-09-22 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“[O]ur appellate courts are courts for the correction of errors of law committed in the trial court [and] absent special circumstances, an appellate court need not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal.”

Andrew J. Arlotta v. Brooke T. Arlotta · 2024-09-23 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

MERITAGE HOMES OF GEORGIA, INC. v. BILLY JONES · 2024-06-21 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“[O]ur appellate courts are courts for the correction of errors of law committed in the trial court. Routinely, this Court refuses to review issues not raised in the trial court[.]”

HUIMING SONG v. EGPS SOLUTIONS I, INC. · 2024-03-12 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“[A]bsent special circumstances, an appellate court need not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal.”

TAYLOR GREENWALD, II v. GLYNN COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS · 2024-02-05 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“Routinely, this Court refuses to review issues not raised in the trial court. . . . Fairness to the trial court and to the parties demands that legal issues be asserted in the trial court.”

Middleton v. State · 2023-07-05 · Supreme Court of Georgia · 2 pin-cites · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“[A]bsent special circumstances, an appellate court need not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal.”

SOUTHERN STATES CHEMICAL, INC. v. TAMPA TANK AND WELDING, INC · 2023-05-31 · Supreme Court of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“[A]bsent special circumstances, an appellate court need not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal.”

Ashley Claxton v. Dale Adams · 2020-09-21 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“absent special circumstances, an appellate court need not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal”

Deisha Shamblin v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints · 2019-10-31 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“To consider the case on a completely different basis from that presented below would be contrary to the line of cases holding, ‘He must stand or fall upon the position taken in the trial court.’”

Agsouth Farm Credit, Aca v. D. Chris West · 2019-10-30 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“In responding to a motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs have a statutory duty to produce whatever viable theory of recovery they might have or run the risk of an adjudication on the merits of their case.”

Steve R. Rautenberg v. Robert L. Pope · 2019-07-22 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“[O]ur appellate courts are courts for the correction of errors of law committed in the trial court.”

RAUTENBERG v. POPE Et Al. · 2019-07-02 · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

"[O]ur appellate courts are courts for the correction of errors of law committed in the trial court."

Georgia carry.org, Inc. v. the Atlanta Botanical Garden, Inc. · 2018-03-14 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

"[A party] must stand or fall upon the position taken in the trial court. Fairness to the trial court and to the parties demands that legal issues be asserted in the trial court."

Cmgrp, Inc. v. Maggie Gallant · 2017-10-04 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

"Routinely, this Court refuses to review issues not raised in the trial court.... Fairness to the trial court and to the parties demands that legal issues be asserted in the trial court."

Southwestern Emergency Physicians, P.C. v. Thu Carey Nguyen · 2014-11-21 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“Fairness to the trial court and to the parties demands that legal issues be asserted in the trial court.”

Southwestern Emergency Physicians, P.C. v. Nguyen · 2014-11-21 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“Fairness to the trial court and to the parties demands that legal issues be asserted in the trial court.”

Nydia Tisdale v. City of Cumming, Georgia · 2014-03-05 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“once a defendant points out that there is an absence of evidence to support plaintiff’s case, the burden then shifts to the plaintiff, who must point to specific evidence giving rise to triable issue.”

Tisdale v. City of Cumming · 2014-03-05 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“[0]nce a defendant points out that there is an absence of evidence to support the plaintiff’s case, the burden then shifts to the plaintiff, who must point to specific evidence giving rise to triable issue.”

Shawn Danes, Administratrix of the Estate of William Danes v. Andee Rogers · 2013-11-06 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“As we held in Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, once a defendant points out that there is an absence of evidence to support the plaintiff’s case, the burden then shifts to the plaintiff, who must point to specific evidence giving rise to a triable issue.”

Danes v. Rogers · 2013-11-06 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

O'Dell v. Mahoney · 2013-10-28 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“absent special circumstances, an appellate court need not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal”

Duncan v. Klein · 2011-11-29 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“Fairness to the trial court and to the parties demands that legal issues be asserted in the trial court”

Abushmais v. Erby · 2007-10-29 · Supreme Court of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“[f]airness to the trial court and to the parties demands that legal issues be asserted in the trial court. [Cits.]”

Davis v. Whitford Properties, Inc. · 2006-10-31 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“trial court cannot be reversed on any ground or argument not presented for or against the motion for summary judgment”

Liberty v. Storage Trust Properties, L.P. · 2004-06-17 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“absent special circumstances, an appellate court need not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal”

Doster v. Bates · 2004-03-10 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 573 S.E.2d at 389

“The purpose behind summary judgment is to ‘dispose of litigation expeditiously and avoid useless time and expense to go through a jury trial.’ ”