Cases pin-citing In Re US
In Re US · 2009 · 6 pinpoint citations from 6 cases, 4 distinct passages.
Ramos, Sr v. Department of Children & Family Services
· 2024-05-17 · N.D. Illinois · pin 572 F.3d at 301
“The United States Attorney has the ultimate authority to prosecute cases.”
Rossetti v. Saban
· 2023-09-11 · N.D. Illinois · pin 572 F.3d at 301
“The United States Attorney has the ultimate authority to prosecute cases.”
Estabrook v. Mazak Corporation
· 2019-09-11 · N.D. Indiana · pin 572 F.3d at 301
“Of course, needless recusals exact a significant toll; judges therefore should exercise care in determining whether recusal is necessary, especially when proceedings already are underway.”
Cooper v. Shulkin
· 2018-11-26 · N.D. Illinois · pin 572 F.3d at 301
“[N]eedless recusals exact a significant toll; judges therefore should exercise care in determining whether recusal is necessary, especially when proceedings already are underway.”
Cooper v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
· 2018-11-26 · N.D. Illinois · pin 572 F.3d at 301
“[N]eedless recusals exact a significant toll; judges therefore should exercise care in determining whether recusal is necessary, especially when proceedings already are underway.”
City of Milwaukee v. J. P. Stadtmueller
· 2015-06-09 · Seventh Circuit · pin 572 F.3d at 301
“[W]e decide … whether a reasonable, well‐informed observer could question the Judge’s impartiality.”