Cases pin-citing In Re US · Go Syfert

Cases pin-citing In Re US

In Re US  ·  2009  ·  6 pinpoint citations from 6 cases, 4 distinct passages.


Ramos, Sr v. Department of Children & Family Services  ·  2024-05-17  ·  N.D. Illinois  ·  pin 572 F.3d at 301
“The United States Attorney has the ultimate authority to prosecute cases.”
Rossetti v. Saban  ·  2023-09-11  ·  N.D. Illinois  ·  pin 572 F.3d at 301
“The United States Attorney has the ultimate authority to prosecute cases.”
Estabrook v. Mazak Corporation  ·  2019-09-11  ·  N.D. Indiana  ·  pin 572 F.3d at 301
“Of course, needless recusals exact a significant toll; judges therefore should exercise care in determining whether recusal is necessary, especially when proceedings already are underway.”
Cooper v. Shulkin  ·  2018-11-26  ·  N.D. Illinois  ·  pin 572 F.3d at 301
“[N]eedless recusals exact a significant toll; judges therefore should exercise care in determining whether recusal is necessary, especially when proceedings already are underway.”
Cooper v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs  ·  2018-11-26  ·  N.D. Illinois  ·  pin 572 F.3d at 301
“[N]eedless recusals exact a significant toll; judges therefore should exercise care in determining whether recusal is necessary, especially when proceedings already are underway.”
City of Milwaukee v. J. P. Stadtmueller  ·  2015-06-09  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  pin 572 F.3d at 301
“[W]e decide … whether a reasonable, well‐informed observer could question the Judge’s impartiality.”