Cases pin-citing Gonzalez-Lopez · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Gonzalez-Lopez

Cases pin-citing Gonzalez-Lopez

United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez  ·  2006  ·  76 pinpoint citations from 27 cases, 21 distinct passages.

Marcus Wright v. State  ·  2025-07-23  ·  Court of Appeals of South Carolina  ·  pin 548 U.S. at 140
"Thus, a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to effective representation is not 'complete' until the defendant is prejudiced."
Hohn v. United States  ·  2021-12-09  ·  D. Kansas  ·  pin 548 U.S. at 140
“[A]s we have done in the past, we rest our conclusion of structural error upon the difficulty of assessing the effect of the error.”
In re: CCA Recordings 2255 Litigation  ·  2021-12-09  ·  D. Kansas  ·  pin 548 U.S. at 140
“[A]s we have done in the past, we rest our conclusion of structural error upon the difficulty of assessing the effect of the error.”
Mitchell v. United States  ·  2021-06-28  ·  D. Kansas  ·  pin 548 U.S. at 140
“[A]s we have done in the past, we rest our conclusion of structural error upon the difficulty of assessing the effect of the error.”
In re: CCA Recordings 2255 Litigation  ·  2021-06-14  ·  D. Kansas  ·  pin 548 U.S. at 140
“[A]s we have done in the past, we rest our conclusion of structural error upon the difficulty of assessing the effect of the error.”
United States v. Hopkins  ·  2019-04-08  ·  Tenth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
"The right to select counsel of one's choice ... has been regarded as the root meaning of the constitutional guarantee [of the Sixth Amendment]."
Miller v. Terrillion  ·  2018-12-24  ·  E.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
"The Constitution guarantees a fair trial through the Due Process Clauses, but it defines the basic elements of a fair trial largely through the several provisions of the Sixth Amendment"
McCullough v. State  ·  2018-08-20  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
"We have recognized a trial court's wide latitude in balancing the right to [retained] counsel of choice ... against the demands of its calendar"
Underwood v. Royal  ·  2018-07-02  ·  Tenth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
"[A]s we have done in the past, we rest our conclusion of structural error upon the difficulty of assessing the effect of the error."
Oaks v. Pfister  ·  2017-07-14  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“[A]n element of [the right to counsel] is the right of a defendant who does not require appointed counsel to choose who will represent him.”
Knowles v. Muniz  ·  2017-01-17  ·  C.D. California  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“The Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel encompasses two distinct rights: a right to adequate representation and a right to choose one’s own counsel.”
United States v. Francisco  ·  2016-03-15  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“[T]he right to counsel of choice does not extend to defendants who require counsel to be appointed for them.”
Rishor v. Ferguson  ·  2014-12-03  ·  W.D. Washington  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“Where the right to be assisted by counsel of one’s choice is wrongly denied, therefore, it is unnecessary to conduct an ineffectiveness or prejudice inquiry to establish a Sixth Amendment violation.”
In re Hawver (  ·  2014-11-14  ·  Supreme Court of Kansas  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
"[A]n element of [the right to assistance of counsel] is the right of a defendant who does not require appointed counsel to choose who will represent him."
In re Hawver (  ·  2014-11-14  ·  Supreme Court of Kansas  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“[A]n element of [the right to assistance of counsel] is the right of a defendant who does not require appointed counsel to choose who will represent him.”
State v. Thigpen  ·  2014-01-23  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“Since the right to self-representation is a right that when exercised usually increases the likelihood of a trial outcome unfavorable to the defendant, its denial is not amenable to ‘harmless error’ analysis”
United States v. David Kissi  ·  2013-10-17  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“[A] trial eourt[ ] [has] wide latitude in balancing the right to counsel of choice against the needs of fairness and against demands of its calendar[.]”
United States v. Omar Baskerville  ·  2013-03-13  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“[A] trial court[ ][has] wide latitude in balancing the right to counsel of choice against the needs of fairness and against demands of its calendar[.]”
State v. Langley  ·  2012-03-29  ·  Oregon Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“[T]he right to counsel of choice does not extend to defendants who require counsel to be appointed for them.”
United States v. Robinson  ·  2011-12-05  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“We have previously held that an element of [the right to counsel] is the right of a defendant who does not require appointed counsel to choose who will represent him.”
United States v. Turner  ·  2011-07-11  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“We have little trouble concluding that erroneous deprivation of the right to counsel of choice, with consequences that are necessarily unquantifiable and indeterminate, unquestionably qualifies as structural error.”
United States v. Kaley  ·  2009-08-18  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
"[T]he Sixth Amendment right to counsel of choice ... commands, not that a trial be fair, but that a particular guarantee of fairness be provided—to wit, that the accused be defended by the counsel he believes to be best."
United States v. Horne  ·  2009-07-31  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“[T]he right to counsel of choice does not extend to defendants who require counsel to be appointed for them”
Bradley v. Henry  ·  2007-12-19  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  5 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
"We have previously held that an element of this right is the right of a defendant who does not require appointed counsel to choose who will represent him."
United States v. Eiland  ·  2007-11-27  ·  District of Columbia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 140
“We have previously held that an element of this right [to counsel] is the right of a defendant who does not require appointed counsel to choose who will represent him.”
United States v. Brock  ·  2007-09-06  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 409
“Nor may a defendant ... demand that a court honor his waiver of conflict-free representation.”
Roeur Van v. Kurt Jones, Warden  ·  2007-01-16  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  4 pin-cites  ·  pin 126 L. Ed. 2d at 409
"Counsel cannot be `ineffective' unless his mistakes have harmed his defense (or, at least, unless it is reasonably likely that they have)."
Page 1 of 2   Next →