Cases pin-citing Twombly · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Twombly

Cases pin-citing Twombly

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly  ·  2007  ·  649 pinpoint citations from 362 cases, 202 distinct passages.

Sherrod v. Nexion Health at Marrero, Inc.  ·  2025-10-09  ·  E.D. Louisiana  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Had these concealed facts been disclosed to Mr. Sherrod and/or his legal representative, he would not have entered into an admission agreement with Defendants and become a resident of the facility.”
Jackson, Tre v. Chacon  ·  2025-10-01  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“The standards governing dismissals under Rule 12(b)(6) apply to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).”
GBOHUNMI v. MOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE  ·  2025-09-24  ·  E.D. Pennsylvania  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Defendant intentionally discriminated against Plaintiffs by treating them differently from similarly situated non-African American employees”
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MAXIMUM MEDICAL & REHABILITATION  ·  2025-09-02  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”
Tamara R. Ulmes v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.  ·  2025-09-02  ·  N.D. Ohio  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.”
Francisco-Juan, Luis v. West Palm Beach Sheriff's Office  ·  2025-08-21  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“The standards governing dismissals under Rule 12(b)(6) apply to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).”
Bosman v. McDonough  ·  2025-08-14  ·  E.D. New York  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[T]he pleading must contain something more . . . than . . . a statement of facts that merely creates a suspicion [of] a legally cognizable right of action.”
GOUEM v. RAUFER, DIRECTOR, NEWARK ASYLUM OFFICE, USCIS  ·  2025-08-12  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”
COLLINS v. VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA DELAWARE VALLEY INC  ·  2025-08-08  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.”
ARTISTIC TILE, INC. v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.  ·  2025-08-05  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”
Yzryahl v. Figuccio  ·  2025-07-24  ·  E.D. New York  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[T]he pleading must contain something more . . . than . . . a statement of facts that merely creates a suspicion [of] a legally cognizable right of action.”
Cruz-Ledon v. Service Employees International Union  ·  2025-07-07  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 127 L. Ed. 2d at 544
“Without some factual allegation in the complaint, it is hard to see how a claimant could satisfy the requirement of providing not only ‘fair notice’ of the nature of the claim, but also ‘grounds' on which the claim rests.”
Taylor, Alan v. Dade Correctional Institution  ·  2025-06-29  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“The standards governing dismissals under Rule 12(b)(6) apply to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).”
Zajaros v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLC  ·  2025-06-25  ·  M.D. Tennessee  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“It is the conclusory nature of respondent’s allegations . . . that disentitles them to the presumption of truth.”
Brown v. Ventura  ·  2025-06-20  ·  S.D. New York  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[A]n action is ‘frivolous’ when either: (1) the factual contentions are clearly baseless . . . ; or (2) the claim is based on an indisputably meritless legal theory.”
Francis, Heninston v. Wellpath  ·  2025-05-30  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“The standards governing dismissals under Rule 12(b)(6) apply to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).”
Rodriguez, Diego v. Department of Homeland Security  ·  2025-05-28  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“The standards governing dismissals under Rule 12(b)(6) apply to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).”
ENVOY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CUBIC CORPORATION  ·  2025-05-15  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”
Gencoglanoglu v. Badolati  ·  2025-05-12  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“The standards governing dismissals under Rule 12(b)(6) apply to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).”
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MAXIMUM MEDICAL & REHABILITATION  ·  2025-04-23  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”
Everlake Life Insurance Company v. Dume  ·  2025-04-23  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[W]hen a complaint adequately states a claim, it may not be dismissed based on a district court’s assessment that the plaintiff will fail to find evidentiary support for his allegations or prove his claim to the satisfaction of the factfinder.”
(PS) Laine v. Superior Court of CA, County of San Joaquin  ·  2025-04-15  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[A] plaintiff’s obligation to provide the ‘grounds’ of his ‘entitle[ment] to relief’ 5 requires more than labels and conclusions[.]”
Martinez v. Allison  ·  2025-04-15  ·  N.D. California  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[A] 11 plaintiff's obligation to provide the ‘grounds’ of his ‘entitle[ment] to relief’ requires more than 12 labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do 13 ….”
Laine v. Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin  ·  2025-04-15  ·  N.D. California  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[A] plaintiff’s obligation to provide the ‘grounds’ of his ‘entitle[ment] to relief’ 5 requires more than labels and conclusions[.]”
BUSSINELLI v. TOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH  ·  2025-04-15  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“a plaintiff’s obligation to provide the grounds of his entitlement to relief requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do.”
Bey v. Turner (MAG+)  ·  2025-03-19  ·  M.D. Alabama  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Unless the court requires a repleader—under Rule 12(e) or on its own initiative—a shotgun complaint leads to a shotgun answer.”
Riess, Gary v. Palm Beach Sheriff's Office  ·  2025-03-06  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“The standards governing dismissals under Rule 12(b)(6) apply to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).”
Bounce v. City of Miami Beach  ·  2025-03-06  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“The standards governing dismissals under Rule 12(b)(6) apply to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).”
Douglas T. Tabachnik v. New Water Capital GP, LLC  ·  2024-12-19  ·  D. Delaware  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[W]e disregard legal conclusions and ‘recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements.’”
Douglas T. Tabachnik v. Davis  ·  2024-12-19  ·  D. Delaware  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[W]e disregard legal conclusions and ‘recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements.’”
Douglas T. Tabachnik v. Rothschild & Co US Inc  ·  2024-12-19  ·  D. Delaware  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[W]e disregard legal conclusions and ‘recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements.’”
Douglas T. Tabachnik v. Rosenberg  ·  2024-12-19  ·  D. Delaware  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[W]e disregard legal conclusions and ‘recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements.’”
Douglas T. Tabachnik, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Catterton Management Company, L.L.C.  ·  2024-12-19  ·  D. Delaware  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[W]e disregard legal conclusions and ‘recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements.’”
ENVOY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CUBIC CORPORATION  ·  2024-11-15  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”
De Silva v. Pima County Government  ·  2024-11-12  ·  D. Arizona  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 127 S. Ct. at 544
“[W]e do not require heightened fact pleading of specifics, but only enough 18 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”
DOYLE v. AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY  ·  2024-10-30  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”
Morris, Sr. v. Small Business Administration  ·  2024-10-18  ·  S.D. Ohio  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“Without some specification of factual detail, the complaint completely fails to state any plausible claim against individual defendants . . . under the Iqbal test.”
MCCLINTON v. BERRY  ·  2024-09-25  ·  M.D. Georgia  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[I]t is well settled that a prison inmate has a constitutional right to be protected…from physical assault by other inmates.”
United States v. Brancatelli  ·  2024-09-06  ·  N.D. Ohio  ·  pin 550 U.S. at 544
“[A] well-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it strikes a savvy judge that actual proof of those facts is improbable, and that a recovery is very remote and unlikely.”
Page 1 of 13   Next →