Cases pin-citing Price · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Price

Cases pin-citing Price

Price v. Philpot  ·  2005  ·  12 pinpoint citations from 12 cases, 3 distinct passages.

Taylor v. City of Carlsbad  ·  2025-09-22  ·  D. New Mexico  ·  pin 420 F.3d at 1158
“[E]very order short of a final decree is subject to reopening at the discretion of the district judge.”
Palczynsky v. Oil Patch Group, Inc.  ·  2025-04-07  ·  D. New Mexico  ·  pin 420 F.3d at 1158
“[E]very order short of a final decree is subject to reopening at the discretion of the district judge.”
Geiger v. Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company  ·  2025-03-14  ·  D. Colorado  ·  pin 420 F.3d at 1158
“every order short of a final decree is subject to reopening at the discretion of the district judge.”
Taylor v. City of Carlsbad  ·  2025-02-10  ·  D. New Mexico  ·  pin 420 F.3d at 1158
“[E]very order short of a final decree is subject to reopening at the discretion of the district judge.”
Amaro v. Corizon Health  ·  2024-08-16  ·  Tenth Circuit  ·  pin 420 F.3d at 1158
“The prison mailbox rule . . . holds that a pro se prisoner’s [filings] will be considered timely if given to prison officials for mailing prior to the filing deadline, regardless of when the court itself receives the documents.”
King v. IC Group  ·  2024-08-02  ·  D. Utah  ·  pin 420 F.3d at 1158
“[E]very order short of a final decree is subject to reopening at the discretion of the district judge.”
Peters v. USA  ·  2023-12-20  ·  D. Colorado  ·  pin 420 F.3d at 1158
“[E]very order short of a final decree is subject to reopening at the discretion of the district judge.”
Dixon v. Regional University System of the Oklahoma Board of Regents  ·  2023-05-17  ·  E.D. Oklahoma  ·  pin 420 F.3d at 1158
“[E]very order short of a final decree is subject to reopening at the discretion of the district judge.”
Gale v. Uintah County  ·  2021-10-05  ·  D. Utah  ·  pin 420 F.3d at 1158
“[E]very order short of a final decree is subject to reopening at the discretion of the district judge.”
SME Steel Contractors v. Seismic Bracing  ·  2020-07-06  ·  D. Utah  ·  pin 420 F.3d at 1158
“[E]very order short of a final decree is subject to reopening at the discretion of the district judge.”
Hallum v. Four Corners OB-GYN  ·  2019-12-19  ·  D. Colorado  ·  pin 420 F.3d at 1158
“[E]very order short of a final decree is subject to reopening at the discretion of the district judge.”