Cases pin-citing O'ROURKE
O'ROURKE v. Commonwealth · 2001 · 12 pinpoint citations from 6 cases, 4 distinct passages.
Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., Aplt.
· 2017-09-28 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · pin 778 A.2d at 1194
“Only when the language of the statute is ambiguous does statutory construction become necessary.”
Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., Aplt.
· 2017-09-28 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2 pin-cites
· pin 566 A.2d at 161
“Only when the language of the statute is ambiguous does statutory construction become necessary.”
Allstate Life Insurance v. Commonwealth
· 2012-08-02 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · pin 566 Pa. at 161
“[W]e should not interpret statutory words in isolation, but must read them with reference to the context in which they appear.”
Delaware County v. First Union Corp.
· 2010-04-28 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · pin 566 Pa. at 161
“[W]e should not interpret statutory words in isolation, but must read them with reference to the context in which they appear.”
Solebury Township v. Department of Environmental Protection
· 2007-08-20 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 4 pin-cites
· pin 566 A.2d at 161
"[I]t is not the function of the appellate court to find facts, but to determine whether there is evidence in the record to justify the trial court's findings."
Holland v. Marcy
· 2005-09-28 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 3 pin-cites
· pin 566 A.2d at 161
"we should not interpret statutory words in isolation, but must read them with reference to the context in which they appear"