Handy v. State  ·  2011-10-26  ·  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 110 A.2d at 194

“Ordinarily, premeditation is not established by direct evidence. Rather, it is usually inferred from the facts and surrounding circumstances.”

Hagez v. State  ·  2000-04-03  ·  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 676 A.2d at 992

"Curry II"

Wear v. State  ·  1999-09-02  ·  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 110 A.2d at 194

“[t]he true test is whether the evidence, circumstantial or otherwise, and the inferences that can reasonably be drawn from the evidence, would be sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact, beyond a reasonable doubt, of the guilt of the accused.”