Cases pin-citing Gibson
Gibson v. State · 1992 · 4 pinpoint citations from 3 cases, 3 distinct passages.
Bryan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
· 2012-06-07 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · pin 328 Md. at 687
“The collateral estoppel doctrines operates to a preclusive end, so that when an issue of ultimate fact has been determined once by a valid and final judgment, the issue cannot be litigated again between the same parties in a future *593 action.”
John Crane, Inc. v. Puller
· 2006-05-31 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2 pin-cites
· pin 328 A.2d at 687
“The collateral estoppel doctrine operates to a preclusive end, so that when an issue of ultimate fact has been determined once by a valid and final judgment, *27 that issue cannot be litigated again between the same parties in a future action.”
Colandrea v. Wilde Lake Community Ass'n
· 2000-11-08 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · pin 328 Md. at 687
“The collateral estoppel doctrine operates to a preclusive end, so that when an issue of ultimate fact has been determined once by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot be litigated again between the same parties in a future action.”