Cases pin-citing Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc. · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc.

Cases pin-citing Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc.

Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc.  ·  2003  ·  11 pinpoint citations from 11 cases, 5 distinct passages.

State v. Keller  ·  2024-04-04  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  pin 80 P.3d at 598
“[A] court must not add words where the legislature has chosen not to include them.”
M.M. v. Tacoma School District No 10  ·  2023-05-04  ·  W.D. Washington  ·  pin 80 P.3d at 598
“[A] court must not add words where the 10 legislature has chosen not to include them.”
Chen v. Sur La Table Inc  ·  2023-02-08  ·  W.D. Washington  ·  pin 80 P.3d at 598
“In addition, if alternative interpretations are possible, the one that best 22 advances the overall legislative purpose should be adopted.”
State v. Haag  ·  2021-09-23  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  pin 80 P.3d at 598
“[A] court must not add words where the legislature has chosen not to include them.”
Green v. Pierce County  ·  2021-05-27  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  pin 80 P.3d at 598
“[A] court must not add words where the legislature has chosen not to include them.”
State v. Jenks  ·  2021-05-27  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  pin 80 P.3d at 598
“[A] court must not add words where the legislature has chosen not to include them.”
W.H. v. Olympia School Dist.  ·  2020-06-18  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  pin 80 P.3d at 598
“[A] court must not add words where the legislature has chosen not to include them.”
State v. Roden  ·  2014-02-27  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  pin 80 P.3d at 598
“court must not add words where the legislature has chosen not to include them”
State v. Roden  ·  2014-02-27  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  pin 80 P.3d at 598
"court must not add words where the legislature has chosen not to include them"
State v. Riofta  ·  2009-06-11  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  pin 80 P.3d at 598
“a court must not add words where the legislature has chosen not to include them”
State v. Riofta  ·  2009-06-11  ·  Washington Supreme Court  ·  pin 80 P.3d at 598
"a court must not add words where the legislature has chosen not to include them"