Cases pin-citing Postema

Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd. · 2000 · 4 pinpoint citations from 4 cases, 3 distinct passages.

Centurylink Comm. Llc, V. Wa Utilities & Transportation Commission · 2025-08-11 · Court of Appeals of Washington · pin 11 P.3d at 726

“[A]n agency’s view of the statute will not be accorded deference if it conflicts with the statute.”

Richard A. Fox And Marnie B. Fox, Apps. v. Skagit County, Res. · 2016-04-11 · Court of Appeals of Washington · pin 11 P.3d at 726

“Thus, a minimum flow set by rule is an existing right which may not be impaired by subsequent groundwater withdrawals.”

Orca v. State, Dept. of Labor & Indus. · 2009-09-22 · Court of Appeals of Washington · pin 11 P.3d at 726

"Unless the superior court takes new evidence under RCW 34.05.562, its findings are not relevant in appellate review of an agency action."

Orca Logistics, Inc. v. Department of Labor · 2009-06-08 · Court of Appeals of Washington · pin 11 P.3d at 726

“Unless the superior court takes new evidence under RCW 34.05.562, its findings are not relevant in appellate review of an agency action.”