Cases pin-citing United States v. Jay v. Ball, United States of America v. Boyd Ridings, Sr.
United States v. Jay v. Ball, United States of America v. Boyd Ridings, Sr. · 1970 · 4 pinpoint citations from 4 cases, 3 distinct passages.
EMPLOYER TRUSTEES OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS AND EMPLOYERS WELFARE FUND v. UNION TRUSTEES OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS AND EMPLOYERS WELFARE FUND
· 2021-02-02 · W.D. Pennsylvania · pin 428 F.2d at 26
“[A] clause stating that a decision of an arbitrator is ‘final and binding’ is no doubt intended to establish a principle similar to that of res judicata, and to bar reconsideration of the disputes fully decided on the merits”
EMPLOYER TRUSTEES OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS AND EMPLOYERS WELFARE FUND v. UNION TRUSTEES OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS AND EMPLOYERS WELFARE FUND
· 2021-02-02 · W.D. Pennsylvania · pin 428 F.2d at 26
“[A] clause stating that a decision of an arbitrator is ‘final and binding’ is no doubt intended to establish a principle similar to that of res judicata, and to bar reconsideration of the disputes fully decided on the merits”
International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. DeeVille Blouse Co.
· 1980-03-17 · E.D. Pennsylvania · pin 428 F.2d at 26
“[t]he question of interpretation of procedural requirements for filing- a grievance is within the jurisdiction of the arbitrator . . courts have no business overruling him because their interpretation of the contract is different from his”
United States v. Darryl Gordon Hickman and Fred McArthur Head
· 1979-03-27 · Sixth Circuit · pin 428 F.2d at 26
“It is not ‘desirable practice’ for him to interrupt the proceedings by questioning the witnesses.”