Cases pin-citing United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company

Cases pin-citing United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company

United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company  ·  1977  ·  6 pinpoint citations from 6 cases, 5 distinct passages.

In Re: The 35th Legislature of V.I.  ·  2024-03-22  ·  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands  ·  pin 567 F.2d at 121
“[T]he immunity from judicial inquiry afforded by the Speech or Debate Clause is personal to members of Congress. Where they are not harassed by personal suit against them, the clause cannot be invoked.”
House Committees' Authority to Investigate for Impeachment  ·  2020-01-19  ·  Office of Legal Counsel  ·  pin 567 F.2d at 121
“[E]ach branch should take cognizance of an im- plicit constitutional mandate to seek optimal accommodation through a realistic evaluation of the needs of the conflicting branches in the particu- lar fact situation.”
Exclusion of Agency Counsel from Congressional Depositions in the Impeachment Context  ·  2019-11-01  ·  Office of Legal Counsel  ·  pin 567 F.2d at 121
“[E]ach branch should take cognizance of an implicit constitutional mandate to seek optimal accommodation through a realistic evaluation of the needs of the conflicting branches in the particu- lar fact situation.”
Attempted Exclusion of Agency Counsel from Congressional Depositions of Agency Employees  ·  2019-05-23  ·  Office of Legal Counsel  ·  pin 567 F.2d at 121
“[E]ach branch should take cognizance of an implicit constitutional mandate to seek optimal accommodation through a realistic evaluation of the needs of the conflicting branches in the par- ticular fact situation.”
Attempted Exclusion of Agency Counsel from Congressional Depositions of Agency Employees  ·  2019-05-23  ·  Office of Legal Counsel  ·  pin 567 F.2d at 121
“[E]ach branch should take cognizance of an implicit constitutional mandate to seek optimal accommodation through a realistic evaluation of the needs of the conflicting branches in the par- ticular fact situation.”
Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services to Pay for Private Counsel to Represent an Employee Before Congressional Committees  ·  2017-01-18  ·  Office of Legal Counsel  ·  pin 567 F.2d at 121
“[E]ach branch should take cognizance of an implicit constitutional mandate to seek optimal accommodation through a realistic evaluation of the needs of the conflicting branches in the particular fact situation.”