Lucyk v. Materion Brush, Inc.  ·  2023-07-07  ·  N.D. Ohio  ·  pin 720 F.2d at 909

“The court should defer to the judgment of experienced counsel who has competently evaluated the strength of his proofs.”

Clark v. Pizza Baker, Inc.  ·  2022-10-31  ·  S.D. Ohio  ·  pin 720 F.2d at 909

“The court should defer to the judgment of experienced counsel who has competently evaluated the strength of his proofs.”

Gresky v. Checker Notions Company, Inc.  ·  2022-08-26  ·  N.D. Ohio  ·  pin 720 F.2d at 909

“The court should defer to the judgment of experienced counsel who has competently evaluated the strength of his proofs.”

Rawlings v. BMW Financial Services NA, LLC  ·  2022-07-27  ·  S.D. Ohio  ·  pin 720 F.2d at 909

“The court should defer to the judgment of experienced counsel who has competently evaluated the strength of his proofs.”

Bailey v. The Paradies Shops, LLC  ·  2021-08-18  ·  S.D. Ohio  ·  pin 720 F.2d at 909

“The court should defer to the judgment of experienced counsel who has competently evaluated the strength of his proofs. . . . [T]he deference afforded counsel should correspond to the amount of discovery completed and the character of the evidence uncovered.”

Macaluso v. Zirtual Startups, LLC  ·  2021-08-17  ·  S.D. Ohio  ·  pin 720 F.2d at 909

“The court should defer to the judgment of experienced counsel who has competently evaluated the strength of his proofs.”

Bailey v. Black Tie Management Company LLC  ·  2020-08-12  ·  S.D. Ohio  ·  pin 720 F.2d at 909

“The court should defer to the judgment of experienced counsel who has competently evaluated the strength of his proofs .... [T]he deference afforded counsel should correspond to the amount of discovery completed and the character of the evidence uncovered.”

ArmorSource LLC v. Kapah  ·  2020-03-30  ·  S.D. Ohio  ·  pin 720 F.2d at 909

“A consent decree is essentially a settlement agreement subject to continued judicial policing.”

Ganci v. MBF Inspection Services, Inc.  ·  2019-12-03  ·  S.D. Ohio  ·  pin 720 F.2d at 909

“The court should defer to the judgment of experienced counsel who has competently evaluated the strength of his proofs. . . . [T]he deference afforded counsel should correspond to the amount of discovery completed and the character of the evidence uncovered.”

Rotondo v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.  ·  2019-11-20  ·  S.D. Ohio  ·  pin 720 F.2d at 909

“The court should defer to the judgment of experienced counsel who has competently evaluated the strength of his proofs. . . . [T]he deference afforded counsel should correspond to the amount of discovery completed and the character of the evidence uncovered.”