Cases pin-citing Tangreti
Tangreti v. Bachmann · 2020 · 18 pinpoint citations from 18 cases, 12 distinct passages.
Randolph v. Pearson
· 2025-09-29 · D. Connecticut · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“[T]here is no special rule for supervisory liability.”
Kelly v. Miller
· 2025-08-11 · S.D. New York · pin 983 F.3d at 609
"[T]here is no special rule for supervisory liability. Instead, a plaintiff must plead and prove 'that each Government-official defendant, through the official's own individual actions, has violated the Constitution.' "
Cartagena v. Uhler
· 2025-06-25 · N.D. New York · pin 983 F.3d at 609
"There is no special rule for supervisor liability."
Bey v. Westchester County Police Headquaters
· 2025-04-24 · S.D. New York · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“[A] plaintiff must plead and prove that each Government- official defendant, through the official's own individual actions, has violated the Constitution.”
VonDrake Harris v. Berchem
· 2025-03-28 · D. Connecticut · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“[A] plaintiff must plead and prove the elements of the underlying constitutional violation directly against the official without relying on a special test for supervisory liability.”
Fautner v. Quinous
· 2024-11-25 · D. Connecticut · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“[I]t is not enough for [a plaintiff] to show that [a defendant] was negligent, or even grossly negligent, in her supervision of the correctional officers or in failing to act on the information she had.”
Hernaiz v. Wagner
· 2024-10-11 · D. Connecticut · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“[A] plaintiff must plead and prove the elements of the underlying constitutional violation directly against the official without relying on a special test for supervisory liability.”
Rubet v. Quiros
· 2024-09-13 · D. Connecticut · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“plaintiff must plead and prove ‘that each Government- official defendant, through the official's own individual actions, has violated the Constitution.”
Jordan v. Wright
· 2024-08-09 · D. Connecticut · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“To hold a state official liable under § 1983, a plaintiff must plead and prove the elements of the underlying constitutional violation directly against the official without relying on a special test for supervisory liability.”
Lopez v. Capega
· 2024-05-31 · D. Connecticut · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“a plaintiff must plead and prove the elements of the underlying constitutional violation directly against the official without relying on a special test for supervisory liability”
Saunders v. Doe
· 2024-05-30 · D. Connecticut · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“a plaintiff must plead and prove the elements of the underlying constitutional violation directly against the official without relying on a special test for supervisory liability”
Silva v. State of New York
· 2024-01-23 · N.D. New York · pin 983 F.3d at 609
"There is no special rule for supervisor liability."
Nunez-Polanco v. Capra
· 2023-01-03 · S.D. New York · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“To hold a state official liable under § 1983, a plaintiff must plead and prove the elements of the underlying constitutional violation directly against the official . . . .”
Walker v. Capra
· 2022-11-28 · N.D. New York · pin 983 F.3d at 609
"There is no special rule for supervisor liability."
Griffin v. Corporation Counsel
· 2022-11-14 · S.D. New York · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“To hold a state official liable under § 1983, a plaintiff must plead and prove the elements of the underlying constitutional violation directly against the official . . . .”
Burrell v. Annucci
· 2022-09-30 · N.D. New York · pin 983 F.3d at 609
"There is no special rule for 8 supervisor liability."
Tubbs v. Venettozzi
· 2022-09-29 · N.D. New York · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“[The plaintiff] must . . . establish that [the defendant] violated [his constitutional rights] by [the defendant’s] own conduct, not by reason of [the defendant’s] supervision of others who committed the violation.”
Yifru v. Tietz
· 2022-03-29 · S.D. New York · pin 983 F.3d at 609
“To hold a state official liable under § 1983, a plaintiff must plead and prove the elements of the underlying constitutional violation directly against the official . . . .”