Barney Greengrass, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.  ·  2011-11-04  ·  Second Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 426 Mass. at 115

“The exclusion should not reflexively be applied to accidents arising during the course of normal business activities simply because they involve a ‘discharge, dispersal, release or escape’ of an ‘irritant or contaminant.’ ”

John Beaudette, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance a Mutual Co.  ·  1999-11-02  ·  D. Massachusetts  ·  pin 426 Mass. at 115

“‘when construing language in an insurance policy, we “consider what an objectively reasonable insured, reading the relevant policy language, would expect to be covered” ’ ”

Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance  ·  1999-07-27  ·  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 426 Mass. at 115

"The exclusion should not reflexively be applied to accidents arising during the course of normal business activities simply because they involve a discharge, dispersal, release or escape' of an `irritant or contaminant.'"