BARRETT v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.  ·  2022-09-23  ·  W.D. Pennsylvania  ·  pin 23 F.3d at 772

“when a settlement agreement is not filed with the court, it is not a ‘judicial record’ for purposes of the right of access doctrine.”

Twin Falls NSC, LLC v. Southern Idaho Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC  ·  2020-09-14  ·  D. Idaho  ·  pin 23 F.3d at 772

“The burden of justifying the confidentiality of each and every document sought to be covered by a protective order remains on the party seeking the order.”

Advance Local Media, LLC v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections  ·  2019-03-18  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 23 F.3d at 772

"By virtue of the fact that the Newspapers challenge the validity of the Order of Confidentiality entered in the main action, they meet the requirement of Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b)(2) that their claim must have 'a question of law or fact in common' with the main action."